Targeted sanctions are increasingly used by the United Nations (UN) Security Council to address major challenges to international peace and security. Unlike other sanctions, those imposed by the UN are universally binding and relied upon as a basis for legitimating both unilateral and regional sanctions measures. Encompassing a wide range of individual, diplomatic, financial, and sectoral measures, targeted sanctions allow senders to target a specific individual, corporate entity, region, or sector, helping to minimize the negative effects of sanctions on wider populations. This article introduces the Targeted Sanctions Consortium (TSC) quantitative and qualitative datasets, which encompass all UN targeted sanctions imposed between 1991 and 2013, or 23 different country regimes broken into 63 case episodes for comparative analysis. Adding to existing datasets on sanctions (HSE, TIES), these new, closely interrelated datasets enable scholars using both quantitative and qualitative methods to: (1) differentiate among different purposes, types of sanctions, and target populations, (2) assess the scope of different combinations of targeted measures, (3) access extensive details about UN sanctions applied since the end of the Cold War, and (4) analyze changing dynamics within sanctions regimes over time in ways other datasets do not. The two TSC datasets assess UN targeted sanctions as effective 22% of the time and describe major aspects of UN targeted sanctions regimes, including the types of sanctions, their purposes and targets, impacts, relationships with other institutions, sanctions regimes, and policy instruments, mechanisms of coping and evasion, and unintended consequences.
No abstract
For bibliographies on targeted sanctions, especially the 1267 committee, see the Watson Institute for International Studies projects on targeted sanctions and terrorist financing, www.watsoninstitute.org. The Center for Global Counter-Terrorism Cooperation provides excellent analysis and information regarding security council efforts to counter terrorism, www.globalct.org.Much has been written about the role of UN sanctions to counter terrorism in the aftermath of the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks, specifically sanctions against al Qaeda and the Taliban under resolution 1267, and broader UN counterterrorism initiatives under resolution 1373. 1 Less attention has been focused on multilateral sanctions for nonproliferation objectives, despite the extensive efforts of the security council since the end of the Cold War to thwart proliferation as well as terrorism. Indeed, before the December 2009 arms embargo was imposed on Eritrea, no new UN sanctions had been adopted since 2006 that were not proliferation or terrorism-related. This article will discuss current UN sanctions to counter the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) by Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea), consider the lessons of counterterrorism
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.