Objectives: This study qualitatively explored parents' perspectives en their experiences of, access to, and outcomes from, cochlear implantation for their child with complex needs. Methods: Purposive sampling was used to recruit 10 parents of children with varying additional disabilities. The age range of the children was between 2 and 11 years at the time. A semi-structured interview format was used to collect data and the interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for analysis. Thematic content analysis was used to explore the data. Results: Individual themes were clustered together to form four main themes describing parents' perspectives and experience. The four main themes were: 'Assessment process', 'Reported benefits of cochlear implantation', 'Wearing the processor' and 'Educational issues'. Discussion: The findings from the study indicate how cochlear implantation was valued by the parents of children with complex needs. They appreciated changes in their child's communication and social changes where the child was more included in family life. Challenges relating to delays in the assessment process were reported. Similarly, the difficulties associated in accessing the technology were identified and perceived by some parents as discriminatory. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation has come a long way over the years. This study provides a useful insight into the issues raised by parents of deaf children with complex needs. A need for further research in this area of implantation was identified to ensure wider access to this technology for those who may benefit from it and to improve the implantation process for this group of children.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.