Premedication with low-dose intravenous dexmedetomidine, 0.5 microg x kg(-1) or midazolam, 0.025 mg x kg(-1) before ECT may be useful in managing treatment-resistant agitation after ECT, without adverse effects.
There is still no individual test or a combination of tests that predict difficult intubations accurately. Tests with higher specificity despite low positive predictive value are needed.
We assessed the effect of music on the level of sedation and the electroencephalograph bispectral index (BIS) during the preoperative period. Fifty-four ASA physical status I-II patients, scheduled for elective septo-rhinoplastic surgery, were included in the study. Subjects were assigned to receive either music (music group; n = 28) or no music (control group; n = 26) during the preoperative period. Sedative premedication was provided with midazolam 0.08 mg/kg IM. Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scales (OAAS) scores and BIS values were recorded at specific time intervals. In the control group, there were more patients with an OAAS score of 1 than in the music group at 30 min after midazolam injection. In addition, there were more patients with an OAAS score of 2 in the control group than in the music group at 30-50 min. However, there were significantly more patients with an OAAS score of 3 in the music group than in the control group at 20-50 min. BIS values of the music group were also smaller than the control group at 30 and 40 min. BIS values were significantly decreased from baseline values at 10-50 min in the music group, whereas BIS values decreased at 30-50 min in the control group. In conclusion, listening to music during midazolam premedication is associated with an increase in sedation level in the preoperative period as reflected by a lower BIS value.
This study indicates that the CO(2) pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position used during laparoscopy increase endotracheal cuff pressure and lead to discomfort in the postoperative patient. Measurement of endotracheal cuff pressure is a simple and inexpensive procedure and should be applied in patients under going laparoscopic surgery.
The objective of this study was to compare clinical and postoperative analgesic effects of femoral or psoas compartment blocks in patients undergoing arthroscopies. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Either femoral (group F) or psoas compartment (group P) block was applied followed by sciatic nerve block. All nerve blocks were provided with a 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 ml of lignocaine (lidocaine) 2%. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate, and pulse oxymetry (SpO2) were recorded. Quality of anaesthesia, time to first analgesic use, verbal pain scores (VPS), sensorial and motor blockade resolution times and side effects were also recorded. Quality of anaesthesia, complete sensory blockade of obturator and lateral cutaneous nerves were higher in the group P than in group F. However, complete motor blockade findings were similar in both groups. In the group P, VPS values measured at 10 and 15 min were lower than that of group F. These values decreased at 10 min and thereafter as to baseline values. VPS values of the group F declined at 20 min and following measurement times as to baseline values. Durations of motor and sensorial block, and time to first analgesic use were similar between two groups. Total analgesic consumption at first 24 h in group P was lower than those of group F. Regarding heart rates, SpO2, SBP and DBP values, no significant differences were found between the groups. Combined psoas-sciatic technique provided more comfortable intraoperative anaesthesia and better postoperative analgesia when compared with femoral-sciatic technique for arthroscopic procedures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.