The MDS Cognitive Performance Scale, when performed by a trained research nurse using recommended protocols, provides a valid measure of cognitive status in nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVE: We report the development and validation of an MDS-based cognitive index, the MDS Cognition Scale (MDS-COGS), by evaluating it against two popular dementia rating scales, the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).DESIGN: A Cross-sectional study.PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred nursing home residents.MEASUREMENTS: Each study participant was assessed on the GDS and the MMSE by trained medical students. At the same time, but independent of the medical students, a geriatric nurse completed the Minimum Data Set (MDS) instrument on each participant.MAIN RESULTS: The Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS), a categorical measure of cognition that uses MDS items, was compared with the GDS in 133 subjects, using a spli~-sample technique. The GDS was found to be more appropnate as a 4-stage than a 7-stage scale, with GDS stages 1-4 acting as a single stage. The CPS showed very poor percent agreement with GDS stages 5 and 7 (50% or less) and, therefore, was revised by adding other MDS predictors. The new instrument, designated MDS-COGS, is a 0-10 point scale generated from eight MDS cognitive items. The MDS-COGS was then validated against the 4-stage GDS and MMSE in the remaining 67 nursing home residents. Chance-corrected agreement (kappa) between the MDS-COGS and GDS in the 67 subjects was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.70, 0.88), and percent agreement with GDS stages 5 and 7 was 60% and 850/0, respectively. The MDS-COGS was also demonstrated to be a valid measure of cognitive impairment as defined by the MMSE, with sensitivity, specificity, chance-corrected agreement (kappa), and area under the ROC curve, all above 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: The MDS Cognition Scale, the MDS-COGS, provides a valid measure of the presence .and seve~ity of cognitive impairment in nursing home reslden~s using

Although psychosocial aspects of skin diseases are well known, disease-specific questionnaires validated for use in clinical trials are not available to assess the impact of facial acne on health-related quality of life or to evaluate therapeutic change. Development of such an instrument was undertaken and included item generation, reduction and pilot-testing phases. By interviewing acne subjects and dermatologists and literature review, 168 possible items were identified. Next, 165 acne subjects identified which items affected them and rated importance on a 5-point scale. Reduction to a brief questionnaire was performed by evaluating patient-perceived importance and factor analysis; four domains were identified (self-perception, role-emotional, role-social, acne symptoms). After pilot-testing for comprehension in acne subjects, further revisions were made to improve clarity and applicability. The resulting instrument takes 10 minutes to complete, and consists of 24 questions assessing how acne affected certain aspects of patients' lives during the past week on a 7-point scale. Thus, an instrument with excellent content validity was developed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with facial acne, and is comprised of statistically meaningful items of importance to patients. Other measurement characteristics are being assessed in a recently initiated study to evaluate test-retest reliability and responsiveness to therapy.

A brief migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire was developed to assess the quality of life decrement associated with an acute migraine attack in the 24-hour period following headache onset. The migraine quality of life questionnaire has 15 questions across five domains (work functioning, social functioning, energy, concerns, and symptoms). A prospective, observational study was conducted to evaluate the characteristics of internal consistency, construct and discriminant validity, and responsiveness of the migraine quality of life questionnaire. One hundred thirty-eight subjects with migraine were recruited. One hundred seven subjects completed a baseline and a 24-hour postmigraine quality of life questionnaire, along with a migraine diary for recording headache severity, activity limitation, associated symptoms, duration of headache, and use of migraine medication. All five migraine quality of life questionnaire domains showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.74-0.95). The strongest correlations were seen between activity limitation and associated symptoms and the migraine quality of life questionnaire work, social, and energy domains. Significant differences in mean questionnaire scores between subjects were found with frequency of medication use, global change in symptoms, headache duration, and severity. All five domains showed significant responses within subjects from a migraine-free period to an acute migraine period (P < 0.0001). In summary, the migraine quality of life questionnaire showed good internal consistency, construct and discriminant validity, and responsiveness to acute migraine attacks.