Increasing pressure on farming systems due to rapid urbanization and population growth has severely affected soil health and fertility. The need to meet the growing food demands has also led to unsustainable farming practices with the intensive application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, resulting in significant greenhouse gas emissions. Biochar, a multifunctional carbon material, is being actively explored globally for simultaneously addressing the concerns related to improving soil fertility and mitigating climate change. Reviews on biochar, however, mainly confined to lab-scale studies analyze biochar production and its characteristics, its effects on soil fertility, and carbon sequestration. The present review addresses this gap by focusing on biochar field trials to enhance the current understanding of its actual impact on the field, w.r.t. agriculture and climate change. The review presents an overview of the effects of biochar application as observed in field studies on soil health (soil’s physical, chemical, and biological properties), crop productivity, and its potential role in carbon sequestration. General trends from this review indicate that biochar application provides higher benefits in soil properties and crop yield in degraded tropical soils vis-a-vis the temperate regions. The results also reveal diverse observations in soil health properties and crop yields with biochar amendment as different studies consider different crops, biochar feedstocks, and local climatic and soil conditions. Furthermore, it has been observed that the effects of biochar application in lab-scale studies with controlled environments are not always distinctly witnessed in corresponding field-based studies and the effects are not always synchronous across different regions. Hence, there is a need for more data, especially from well-designed long-term field trials, to converge and validate the results on the effectiveness of biochar on diverse soil types and agro-climatic zones to improve crop productivity and mitigate climate change.
As with other anonymous web-based surveys, we cannot verify clinical characteristics that may impact consideration of PGD use. Our findings indicate high-risk men need more information about PGD and may benefit from educational materials to assist them in reproductive decision-making.
Transient changes in wettability complicate the prediction of biochar's hydrologic effects. Biochar wetting properties were characterized from poultry litter biochar (PLBC) produced from slow pyrolysis at temperatures between 300 and 600°C with water drop penetration time (persistence of hydrophobicity) and contact angle (CA; severity of hydrophobicity) measurements. Hydrophobicity was associated with semivolatile organic compounds coating PLBC surfaces, which resulted in 24.4 carbon layers and CAs of 101.1 ± 2.9° at a pyrolysis temperature of 300°C but only 0.4 layers of surface coverage and CAs of 20.6 ± 1.3° when pyrolyzed at 600°C. Mixing PLBC with water removed organic coatings, and storage in water for 72 h decreased CA as much as 81° for the most hydrophobic PLBCs. When mixed with quartz sand of the same particle size, CAs of PLBC-sand mixtures increased from 6.6 ± 1.4° at 0% PLBC mass fraction to 48.3 ± 2.0° at 15% mass fraction. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic PLBCs increased CA by nearly identical amounts at 2 and 5% mass fractions, which was explained by the influence of PLBC particle topology on macroscopic surface roughness of PLBC-sand mixtures. For environmentally relevant situations, PLBC-sand mixtures at mass fractions ≤15% remained water wetting. However, all PLBC additions increased CA, which may alter infiltration rates and induce preferential water flow.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.