The endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) is a lipid mediator involved in various physiological processes. In response to neural activity, 2-AG is synthesized post-synaptically, then activates pre-synaptic cannabinoid CB1 receptors (CB1Rs) in a retrograde manner, resulting in transient and long-lasting reduction of neurotransmitter release. The signalling competence of 2-AG is tightly regulated by the balanced action between ‘on demand’ biosynthesis and degradation. We review recent research on monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL), ABHD6 and ABHD12, three serine hydrolases that together account for approx. 99% of brain 2-AG hydrolase activity. MAGL is responsible for approx. 85% of 2-AG hydrolysis and colocalizes with CB1R in axon terminals. It is therefore ideally positioned to terminate 2-AG-CB1R signalling regardless of the source of this endocannabinoid. Its acute pharmacological inhibition leads to 2-AG accumulation and CB1R-mediated behavioural responses. Chronic MAGL inactivation results in 2-AG overload, desensitization of CB1R signalling and behavioural tolerance. ABHD6 accounts for approx. 4% of brain 2-AG hydrolase activity but in neurones it rivals MAGL in efficacy. Neuronal ABHD6 resides post-synaptically, often juxtaposed with CB1Rs, and its acute inhibition leads to activity-dependent accumulation of 2-AG. In cortical slices, selective ABHD6 blockade facilitates CB1R-dependent long-term synaptic depression. ABHD6 is therefore positioned to guard intracellular pools of 2-AG at the site of generation. ABHD12 is highly expressed in microglia and accounts for approx. 9% of total brain 2-AG hydrolysis. Mutations in ABHD12 gene are causally linked to a neurodegenerative disease called PHARC. Whether ABHD12 qualifies as a bona fide member to the endocannabinoid system remains to be established.

We have previously reported that the endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol (2-AG), is hydrolyzed in rat cerebellar membranes by monoglyceride lipase (MGL)-like enzymatic activity. The present study shows that, like MGL, 2-AG-degrading enzymatic activity is sensitive to inhibition by sulfhydryl-specific reagents. Inhibition studies of this enzymatic activity by N-ethylmaleimide analogs revealed that analogs with bulky hydrophobic N-substitution were more potent inhibitors than hydrophilic or less bulky agents. Interestingly, the substrate analog N-arachidonylmaleimide was found to be the most potent inhibitor. A comparison model of MGL was constructed to get a view on the cysteine residues located near the binding site. These findings support our previous conclusion that the 2-AG-degrading enzymatic activity in rat cerebellar membranes corresponds to MGL or MGL-like enzyme and should facilitate further efforts to develop potent and more selective MGL inhibitors.

No abstract

1 At nanomolar concentrations, SR141716 and AM251 act as specific and selective antagonists of the cannabinoid CB 1 receptor. In the micromolar range, these compounds were shown to inhibit basal G-protein activity, and this is often interpreted to implicate constitutive activity of the CB 1 receptors in native tissue. We show here, using [ 35 S]GTPgS binding techniques, that micromolar concentrations of SR141716 and AM251 inhibit basal G-protein activity in rat cerebellar membranes, but only in conditions where tonic adenosine A 1 receptor signaling is not eliminated. 2 Unlike lipophilic A 1 receptor antagonists (potency order DPCPXbN-0840 Ecirsimarin4caf-feine), adenosine deaminase (ADA) was not fully capable in eliminating basal A 1 receptor-dependent G-protein activity. Importantly, all antagonists reduced basal signal to the same extent (20%), and the response evoked by the inverse agonist DPCPX was not reversed by the neutral antagonist N-0840. These data indicate that rat brain A 1 receptors are not constitutively active, but that an ADA-resistant adenosine pool is responsible for tonic A 1 receptor activity in brain membranes. 3 SR141716 and AM251, at concentrations fully effective in reversing CB 1 -mediated responses (10 À6 M), did not reduce basal G-protein activity, indicating that CB 1 receptors are not constitutively active in these preparations. 4 At higher concentrations (1 -2.5 Â 10 À5 M), both antagonists reduced basal G-protein activity in control and ADA-treated membranes, but had no effect when A 1 receptor signaling was blocked with DPCPX. Moreover, the CB 1 antagonists right-shifted A 1 agonist dose -response curves without affecting maximal responses, suggesting competitive mode of antagonist action. The CB 1 antagonists did not affect muscarinic acetylcholine or GABA B receptor signaling. 5 When further optimizing G-protein activation assay for the labile endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), we show, by using HPLC, that pretreatment of cerebellar membranes with methyl arachidonoyl fluorophosphonate (MAFP) fully prevented enzymatic degradation of 2-AG and concomitantly enhanced the potency of 2-AG. In contrast to previous claims, MAFP exhibited no antagonist activity at the CB 1 receptor. 6 The findings establish an optimized method with improved signal-to-noise ratio to assess endocannabinoid-dependent G-protein activity in brain membranes, under assay conditions where basal adenosinergic tone and enzymatic degradation of 2-AG are fully eliminated.

In the present study, identification of chiral 1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ones as potent and selective FAAH inhibitors has been described. The separated enantiomers showed clear differences in the potency and selectivity toward both FAAH and MAGL. Additionally, the importance of the chirality on the inhibitory activity and selectivity was proven by the simplification approach by removing a methyl group at the 3-position of the 1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-one ring. The most potent compound of the series, the S-enantiomer of 3-(1-(4-isobutylphenyl)ethyl)-5-methoxy-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2(3H)-one (JZP-327A, 51), inhibited human recombinant FAAH (hrFAAH) in the low nanomolar range (IC50 = 11 nM), whereas its corresponding R-enantiomer 52 showed only moderate inhibition toward hrFAAH (IC50 = 0.24 μM). In contrast to hrFAAH, R-enantiomer 52 was more potent in inhibiting the activity of hrMAGL compared to S-enantiomer 51 (IC50 = 4.0 μM and 16% inhibition at 10 μM, respectively). The FAAH selectivity of the compound 51 over the supposed main off-targets, MAGL and COX, was found to be >900-fold. In addition, activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) indicated high selectivity over other serine hydrolases. Finally, the selected S-enantiomers 51, 53, and 55 were shown to be tight binding, slowly reversible inhibitors of the hrFAAH.