The cumulative effect of radiation and the extent of related morbidities on oral tissues are enormous and increase over time. The numerous radiation-related side effects have a strong, negative influence on the oral functions and are responsible for a drastic reduction in the oral-health-related quality of life of the cancer survivors. In a significant deviation to the earlier approach of advising extraction of all remaining teeth before RT, the concept of preserving a maximum number of teeth in a state of health and for better oral functions postcancer cure has been globally accepted and is adhered to. The effects of radiation and their impact on the general well-being of the patients underscore the relevance of understanding the sequelae of radiation therapy on healthy oral tissues, preexisting oral diseases and their progression, impact on oral treatment needs, limitations in performing the indicated treatment, and shortcoming in treatment outcomes. It is vital for the professionals involved in head and neck cancer care to follow a well-devised referral system for oral care before and after RT and educate patients for a life-long follow-up K E Y W O R D S head and neck cancer, oral health, osteoradionecrosis, radiation caries, radiotherapy, trismus 238 wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/scd Spec Care Dentist. 2020;40:238-250.
Background:The rising cost of cancer treatment has imposed a huge financial burden on the affected households, leading to catastrophic outcomes and impoverishment. The present study was designed to estimate the economic burden incurred by households for the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) in India. Methods:The present study was undertaken in a large public sector tertiary care hospital of North India. A total of 159 patients were recruited at time of their first registration in the department of Radiation Oncology, and were followed after completion of their treatment. Another 288 were recruited within one month after completion of treatment. Economic burden was assessed in terms of out of pocket (OOP) expenditure incurred, prevalence of catastrophic health expenditure and distress financing (borrowing or selling of assets) related to different modalities of cancer treatment. Results:The average OOP expenditure incurred by a patient of HNC patient was INR 37, 845 (USD 563), which varied from INR 32,379 (USD 482) when a patient undergoes radiotherapy alone to INR 67,480 (USD 1,004) for surgery along with chemo-radiotherapy. Specifically, patients undergoing 2-DRT and IMRT alone had to spend INR 31,487 (USD 469) and INR 42,405 (USD 631) respectively. The prevalence of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and distress financing (DF) was 34% and 45% respectively. The odds of incurring both CHE and DF were found to be higher for patients in the lowest income quartile and for those in the younger age groups. Conclusion:Cancer imposes significant economic burden on households. The existing public health system should be strengthened to reduce OOP expenditure incurred by patients. In addition, enhanced coverage of risk pooling mechanisms should be ensured.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.