Resveratrol is a natural polyphenolic compound and has been shown to exhibit cardio-protective as well as anti-neoplastic effects on various types of cancers. However, the exact mechanism of its anti-tumor effect is not clearly defined. Resveratrol has been shown to have strong hypolipidemic effect on normal adipocytes and as hyper-lipogenesis is a hallmark of cancer cell physiology, we examined the effect of resveratrol on lipid synthesis in cancer stem-like cells (CD24−/CD44+/ESA+) that were isolated from both ER+ and ER− breast cancer cell lines. We found that resveratrol significantly reduced the cell viability and mammosphere formation followed by inducing apoptosis in cancer stem-like cells. This inhibitory effect of resveratrol is accompanied by a significant reduction in lipid synthesis which is caused by the down-regulation of the fatty acid synthase (FAS) gene followed by up-regulation of pro-apoptotic genes, DAPK2 and BNIP3. The activation of apoptotic pathway in the cancer stem-like cells was suppressed by TOFA and by Fumonisin B1, suggesting that resveratrol-induced apoptosis is indeed through the modulation of FAS-mediated cell survival signaling. Importantly, resveratrol was able to significantly suppress the growth of cancer stem-like cells in an animal model of xenograft without showing apparental toxicity. Taken together, our results indicate that resveratrol is capable of inducing apoptosis in the cancer stem-like cells through suppression of lipogenesis by modulating FAS expression, which highlights a novel mechanism of anti-tumor effect of resveratrol.

Aim: Biological and epidemiologic data suggest that 1 alpha, 25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) levels may influence development of renal cell carcinoma. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a crucial mediator for the cellular effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 and additionally interacts with other cell signaling pathways that influence cancer progression. VDR gene polymorphisms may play an important role in risk of incidence for various malignant tumors. This study investigated whether VDR gene polymorphisms were associated with increased risk and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a Japanese population. Methods: To analyze risk of RCC depending on VDR polymorphism, a case-control association study was performed. The VDR gene polymorphisms at three locations, BsmI, ApaI and TaqI, were genotyped in 135 RCC patients and 150 controls in a Japanese population. Logistic regression models were used to assess the genetic effects on prognosis. Results: Significant differences in the ApaI genotype were observed between RCC patients and controls (c 2 = 6.90, P = 0.032). No statistical significant difference was found in the BsmI and TaqI polymorphisms. The frequency of the AA genotype in the ApaI polymorphism was significantly higher in the RCC patients than in the controls (odds ratio, 2.59; 95% confidence intervals, 1.21-5.55; P = 0.012). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the AA genotype was an independent prognostic factor for cause-specific survival (relative risk 3.3; P = 0.038). Conclusion:The AA genotype at the ApaI site of the VDR gene may be a risk of incidence and poor prognosis factor for RCC in the Japanese population. Additional studies with a large sample size and investigation of the functional significance of the ApaI polymorphism in RCC cells are warranted.

No abstract

These results suggest that VD agents may be effective as a treatment for renal cell carcinoma, especially when micrometastases are involved.

Objective: Although cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cystectomy was demonstrated to improve the survival among patients with locally advanced bladder cancer, its severe adverse events, including nephrotoxicity, are critical issues. We investigated the safety and activity of carboplatin, a mild nephrotoxic agent, combined with gemcitabine as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin for patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 68 patients with locally advanced bladder cancer who received neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (n ¼ 34) or gemcitabine and carboplatin (n ¼ 34) followed by cystectomy at our institute. The adverse events, chemotherapy delivery profile, rate of down-stage and recurrence-free survival were assessed for methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and carboplatin. Results: The mean cycles of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, and gemcitabine and carboplatin, were 2.5 and 2.7, respectively. The hematologic adverse events of Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia for methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin were 15, 18 and 0%, respectively. The occurrences for gemcitabine and carboplatin were 53, 21 and 50%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities for methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin were nausea and vomiting in 24%, and were not observed for gemcitabine and carboplatin. The lowest median estimated glomerular filtration rate during methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin and gemcitabine and carboplatin was 55.8 and 70.6 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , respectively (P ¼ 0.002). The rate of downstage to pT1 or less was 59% for methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, and 53% for gemcitabine and carboplatin (P ¼ 0.624). The recurrence-free survival of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, and gemcitabine and carboplatin, at 36 months from the diagnosis was 79 and 75%, respectively (P ¼ 0.85). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and carboplatin showed less non-hematologic toxicity than methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, and especially less nephrotoxicity was demonstrated for gemcitabine and carboplatin. Although observed during the short term, the recurrence-free survival for gemcitabine and carboplatin was comparable to that for methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin.