As an upper limit in determining training intensities, the assessment of AT is the gold standard. However, findings suggest that %HRpeak, %HRR, and %VO2peak can be used alternatively. The use of workload expressed as in W/kg also appears useful.

Interindividual differences between the parameter values have been identified. This could be helpful in methodological conception of preventive training programmes for patients suffering from cardiovascular disease. The mutual connection between the parameter values and age groups does not relate only to a safer training intensity determination, but also to a more precisely targeted application of different training modalities in order to achieve an optimal final training effect.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract