BackgroundNodular follicular lesions of thyroid gland comprise benign and malignant neoplasms, as well as some forms of hyperplasia. “Follicular” refers to origin of cells and in the same time to growth pattern - building follicles. Nodular follicular thyroid lesions have in common many morphological features, therefore attempts were made to define additional criteria for distinction between follicular adenoma, follicular carcinoma and follicular variant of papillary carcinoma. Increasing number of immunohistochemical markers is in the continual process of evaluation.MethodsTissue microarrays incorporating, total 201 cases, out of which 122 malignant and 79 benign follicular lesions, including neoplastic and non-neoplastic, were constructed and immunostained with antibodies to CD56, CK19, Galectin-3, HBME-1. Tissue cores were exclusively being acquired from tumour/lesion on interface with normal thyroid tissue. A systematic review of literature was done for period from the year 2001 to present time.ResultsAll analysed markers may make a difference between benign lesions/tumours from differentiated thyroid carcinomas (p = <0.01, for all markers). Expression of all markers is significantly higher in papillary carcinoma than in follicular adenoma (p < 0.01). Statistically significant difference in expression of Galectin-3 and CD56 between follicular carcinoma and follicular adenoma was registered (p = 0.043; p = 0.028, respectively). The only marker which expression showed statistically significant difference between adenoma and carcinoma of Hurthle cells was Galectin 3 (p = 0.041). CK19 and HBME-1 were significantly expressed more in papillary carcinoma as compared to follicular carcinoma.ConclusionGalectin 3 is most sensitive marker for malignancy, while loss of expression of CD56 is very specific for malignancy. Expected co-expression for combination of markers in diagnosis of follicular lesions decreases sensitivity and increases specificity for malignancy.

We evaluated some proposed molecular thyroid tumor markers: thyroid peroxidase (TPO), galectin-3, cytokeratin-19, and HBME-1, individually and in combination, by immunohistochemistry in a total of 242 archival thyroid tissue sections. The expression of each individual marker was most helpful for the diagnosis of papillary carcinoma and its follicular variant. However, none of them was sensitive and specific enough to discriminate between Hürthle adenoma and carcinoma. Galectin-3 and HBME-1 could be used as single discriminators between follicular thyroid adenoma and carcinoma, but HBME-1 is the better choice. As a single test, all analyzed tumor markers had sufficient power to predict differentiated thyroid cancer, with sensitivities ranging from 66.5% to 82.2%. The sensitivity was improved by using combinations of some proposed markers. Only two antigens, HBME-1 and TPO, had distinct predictive values for different diagnostic alternatives i.e. a sequential combination improved diagnostic accuracy between follicular thyroid adenoma and the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma to 92.6% and consequently, between overall benign and malignant thyroid tumors to 89.1%. HBME-1 is the most accurate ancillary stain in discriminating well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas from benign tumors, although the addition of TPO did improve accuracy and served as a useful confirmatory marker.

No abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer related death in developed countries. One of the reasons is the absence of tumor specific diagnostic and prognostic markers. The aim of this study was to examine the correlation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and -9 (MMP-9) expressions in serum and clinicopathological features of the colorectal adenocarcinoma. Another aim was to examine expression of MMP-9 in the tissue of the colorectal carcinoma in MMP-9 serum positive patients. In addition, we tried to establish the correlation between preoperative levels of serum markers (CEA and CA 19-9) and presence of MMP-2 or MMP-9. The study was performed on 32 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery and 11 patients in a control group who were operated for benign diseases. The samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE to determine the molecular mass and SDS-PAGE zymography to determine levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9. Expression of MMP-9 was determined immunohistochemically in the tissue of the colorectal carcinoma of MMP-9 serum positive patients. MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels were increased in the serum of the patients with colorectal cancer compared to the control group. There was significant correlation in MMPs levels among the patients with tumor stage I and II and the patients with tumor stage III and IV. Obtained results did not demonstrate correlation between levels of CEA, CA 19-9 and presence of MMP-2 or MMP-9. MMP-9 expression was positive in 85% of MMP-9 serum positive patients with colorectal carcinoma. The overexpression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 strongly suggests its association with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Detection of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in serum might be useful for identification of patients with higher risk for colorectal cancer recurrence.

Colorectal carcinoma is characterized by increased oxidative stress and antioxidant disbalance. Progression of disease is followed by an increase in redox disbalance.