Acute necrotising pancreatitis is associated with an unacceptably high mortality for which no satisfactory remedy exists. Emblica officinalis (E.o.) is a plant prescribed in Ayurveda, the Indian traditional system of medicine, for pancreas-related disorders. This study was carried out to evaluate the protective effect of E.o. against acute necrotising pancreatitis in dogs. Pancreatitis was induced by injecting a mixture of trypsin, bile and blood into the duodenal opening of the pancreatic duct. Twenty eight dogs were divided into 4 groups (n = 6-8 each): GpI–control, GpII–acute pancreatitis, GpIII–sham-operated, GpIV–pretreatment with 28 mg E.o./kg/day for 15 days before inducing pancreatitis. Serum amylase increased from 541.99 ± 129.13 IU/ml to 1592.63 ± 327.83 IU (p<0.02) 2 hrs after the induction of pancreatitis in GpII. The rise in serum amylase in both GpIII and GpIV was not significant. On light microscopic examination, acinar cell damage was less and the total inflammatory score was significantly lower in the E.o. treated group as compared to GpII. Electron microscopy confirmed this and showed an increased amount of smooth, endoplasmic reticulum and small, condensed granules embedded in a vacuole. More studies are needed to explore the clinical potential of E.o. and its mechanism of action.

Background: Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a disease caused by impaired lipoprotein lipase function and characterized by chylomicronemia, reduced quality of life (QoL) and risk of pancreatitis. The aim of the current study is to assess if QoL can be improved by patients being connected to other patients. Methods: Respondents (N = 50) categorized into 3 groups (actively connected, passively connected and non-connected) self-reported their current or comparative assessments of QoL before and after connection with FCS-focused support organizations using a customized retrospective web-based survey. Results: Connected respondents showed significantly improved perceptions of overall health, disease severity, motivation to take care of health and emotional well-being (p ≤ 0.05). Any level of connection produced noticeable benefits, but active connection in the form of regular interaction with other patients reported the greatest improvements. Additionally, respondents reported higher levels of satisfaction with their primary treating physician after being connected. The majority of patients (62%) reported joining support groups following referrals from their physicians. Conclusions: Similar to other disease states, connecting with other patients with FCS had a positive impact on aspects of quality of life. Physicians may play a central role in referring their patients with FCS to support groups.

No abstract