Digital pathology (DP) is changing pathology departments dramatically worldwide, yet globally, few departments are presently digitalized for the full diagnostic workflow. Denmark is also on the road to full digitalization countrywide, and this study aim to cover experiences during the implementation process in a national context. Thus, quantitative questionnaires were distributed to all pathology departments in Denmark ( n = 13) and distributed to all professions including medical clinical directors, medical doctors (MD) and biomedical laboratory scientists (BLS). For a qualitative perspective, we interviewed four employees representing four professions. Data were collected in 2019–2020. From the questionnaire and interviews, we found strategies differed at the Danish departments with regards to ambitions, technological equipment, workflows, and involvement of type of professions. DP education was requested by personnel. Informants were in general positive toward the digital future but mainly had concerns regarding the political pressure to integrate DP before technological advances are sufficient for maintaining rational budgets, workflows, and for sustaining diagnostic quality. This study is a glance on the Danish implementation process in its early stages from personnel’s point of view. It shows the complexity when large new workflow processes are to be implemented countrywide and with a large diversity of stakeholders like managers, MD, BLS, IT-professionals, and authorities. To ensure best technological and economical solutions and to maintain—or even optimize—diagnostic quality with DP and workflow alignment, we suggest superior inter- and intradepartmental communication. When implementing DP countrywide, a national working group is warranted with the variety of stakeholders represented.

Vejledningen er udarbejdet med fokus på Bioanalytikeruddannelsen, men vil også kunne anvendes af andre, der arbejder med den sundhedsvidenskabelige arbejdsmetode. Den vil kunne anvendes i forbindelse med projektarbejde, der inkluderer udarbejdelse af en skriftelig rapport som f.eks. litteraturstudie, projektbeskrivelse eller bachelorprojekt

Gruppebaserede læringsrum er karakteriseret ved stor variation i design og aktiviteter, hvilket kan give anledning til uensartet forståelse af rummene.  Vi undersøger, hvordan studerende oplever tre læringsrum samt deres betydning for læringsudbyttet. Samtidig undersøges en konkret model; Group Learning Activity Instructional Design Model (GLAID-modellen) som analyseredskab ved design og evaluering af gruppebaserede læringsrum. Studenterevalueringer samt fokusgruppeinterviews, vedrørende læringsrummene Workshop, Digital Arbejdsportfolio og Opsamling, analyseres og diskuteres under inddragelse af teori om gruppebaseret læring og design af gruppebaserede lærings-aktiviteter. Overordnet set oplever de studerende de gruppebaserede læringsrum som væsentlige for deres læringsudbytte. Samtidigt ses, at ikke alle studerende anvender rummene som intenderet. GLAID-modellen guider til fokus på aktuelle design-komponenter. De planlagte læringsrum understøtter potentielt forskellige dele af læreprocessen, men vi når ikke altid i mål med vores intentioner. Facilitering samt tydeliggørelse af intentionen med læringsrummene skal styrkes. GLAID-modellen bidrager til skærpet opmærksomhed og struktureret refleksion og vurderes relevant på flere uddannelsesniveauer.