It has been demonstrated that during pregnancy expiratory reserve volume (ERV) decreases and minute ventilation (VE) increases initially and then stabilizes. In order to determine the role of thoracoabdominal mechanics, control of breathing, and inspiratory muscle function in these alterations, we studied inspiratory pressures, lung volumes, thoracic configuration, and respiratory drive in 18 normal pregnant women at Weeks 13, 21, 30, and 37 of pregnancy. Ten of them were studied 6 months after delivery. Transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) was measured at Week 37 and 3 months after delivery in an additional group of seven women. VE as well as VT/TI increased early during gestation and remained unchanged thereafter. In contrast, mouth occlusion pressure (P0.1) increased progressively during pregnancy, from 1.53 +/- 0.16 (mean +/- SE) to 2.02 +/- 0.18 cm H2O, and fell significantly to 1.1 +/- 0.15 cm H2O after delivery, indicating that effective respiratory impedance increases during pregnancy. Mean P0.1 correlated with progesterone plasma levels (r = 0.918 p less than 0.05). No changes in Plmax, PEmax, and Pdimax, were observed. End-expiratory gastric pressure (Pga) increases significantly during pregnancy: 11.8 +/- 0.8 versus 8.4 +/- 1.12 cm H2O after delivery (p less than 0.012). This increment was correlated with the fall in ERV observed in late pregnancy (r = 0.74 p less than 0.05). Our results demonstrate that during pregnancy ventilatory drive and respiratory impedance increase with the consequent stabilization of VE, but our data do not permit us to differentiate whether the increment in P0.1 is secondary to the increase in impedance or to the rise in progesterone. Respiratory muscle function remains normal despite the alteration of thoracic configuration.
I In ns sp pi ir ra at to or ry y m mu us sc cl le e t tr ra ai in ni in ng g i in n c ch hr ro on ni ic c a ai ir rf fl lo ow w l li im mi it ta at ti io on n: : c co om mp pa ar ri is so on n o of f t tw wo o d di if ff fe er re en nt t t tr ra ai in ni in ng g l lo oa ad ds s w wi it th h a a t th hr re es sh ho ol ld ABSTRACT: The usefulness of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in chronic airflow limitation (CAL) patients is a controversial issue, mainly due to differences in the training load. To further evaluate this aspect, we studied the effect of the magnitude of the load using a threshold pressure trainer.Ten CAL patients (5 males, 5 females), 67±2 yrs (mean±SEM) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ) 36±2% pred, were trained for 30 min a day using a load of 30% of their maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax) (Group 1). Another 10 CAL patients (5 males, 5 females), 73±2 yrs and FEV 1 37±2% pred), were trained using only 12% of their PImax (Group 2). Training was assessed by PImax, inspiratory muscle power output (IMPO), sustainable inspiratory pressure (SIP), maximal inspiratory flow rate (VImax), pattern of breathing during loaded breathing, Mahler's dyspnoea score, and the 6 min walking distance (6MWD).After 5 weeks of training, Group 1 exhibited significant increments in: PImax (34±11%); IMPO (92±16%); SIP (36±9%); and VImax (34±13%). Dyspnoea was also reduced, and the 6MWD increased by 48±22 m. We observed no significant changes in Group 2. During loaded breathing, Group 1 showed a significant increment in tidal volume (VT) and mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI), and a reduction in inspiratory time (TI). In Group 2, VT and VT/TI also increased significantly, but the breathing frequency increased with a reduction of expiratory time. When comparing both groups after training, significant differences in PImax, IMPO, VImax and dyspnoea were observed, with no significant changes in the other parameters.We conclude that, in patients with chronic airflow limitation, inspiratory muscle training with a high enough load improves inspiratory muscle strength and power output, reduces dyspnoea, and makes the pattern of breathing adequate during loaded breathing. These changes may allow patients to cope better with increased loads imposed by physical effort and exacerbation of symptoms.
We studied the effects of an 8-h, once-a-week schedule of cuirass ventilation (CV) in 5 patients with advanced chronic air-flow limitation and chronic hypercarbia (PaCO2, 58.6 +/- 10.1 mm Hg; mean +/- SD). Repeated measurements of arterial blood gases, maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (P1max), 12-min walking distance, and respiratory cycle were performed during a 1-month run-in period. Quality of life and transdiaphragmatic pressure were measured once. All patients completed the planned 4-month study. Four of them were ventilated for longer periods because CV could not be discontinued at the end of the study. PaCO2 showed a significant fall starting during the first month; PaO2 significantly increased from the second month, whereas P1max significantly rose from the third month on. Maximal transdiaphragmatic pressure increased in the 2 patients with abnormal baseline values. The fall in PaCO2 was associated with an increase in tidal volume because of a longer inspiratory time. Significant improvements in quality of life and in the 12-min walking distance were observed. We conclude that weekly CV improves blood gases, inspiratory muscle strength, and clinical conditions of patients with chronic air-flow limitation and chronic hypercarbia, probably because of correction of chronic inspiratory muscle fatigue.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.