No abstract

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, 4oes not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof." This report has been reproduceddirectly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; prices available from (615)576-8401, FTS 626-8401.

Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-941D13223t DISCLAIMERPortions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. ECONOMICS OF ALASKA NORTH SLOPE GAS UTILIZATION OPTIONS ABSTRACTThe recoverable natural gas available for sale in the developed and known undeveloped fields on the Alaskan North Slope (ANS) total about 26 trillion cubic feet (TCF), including 22 TCF in the Prudhoe Bay Unit (PBU) and 3 TCF in the undeveloped Point Thomson Unit (PTU). No significant commercial use has been made of this large natural gas resource because there are no facilities in place to transport this gas to current markets. To date the economics have not been favorable to support development of a gas transportation system. However, with the declining trend in A N S oil production, interest in development of this huge gas resource is rising, making it important for the U.S. Department of Energy, industry, and the State of Alaska to evaluate and assess the options for development of this vast gas resource.The purpose of this study was to assess whether gas-to-liquids (GTL) conversion technology would be an economic alternative for the development and sale of the large, remote, and currently &arketable A N S natural gas resource, and to compare the long term economic impact of a GTL conversion option to that of the more frequently discussed natural gas pipeline/liquefied natural gas (LNG) option. The major components of the study are: an assessment of the A N S oil and gas resources; an analysis of conversion and transportation options; a review of natural gas, LNG, and selected oil product markets; and an economic analysis of the LNG and GTL gas sales options based on publicly available input needed for assumptions of the economic variables. Uncertainties in assumptions are evaluated by determining the sensitivity of project economics to changes in baseline economic variables.The projects evaluated assume gas sales from PBU start in 2005 and reach a peak rate of 2.05 billion cubic feet per day (BCFPD) in 2009, and sales from PTU starting in 2008 at 0.44 BCFPD, for a combined peak rate of 2.49 BCFPD. This results in sales of 17 million metric tomes per year of LNG, or 300 thousand barrels per day of a GTL liquid hydrocarbon product compatible with the North Slope crude oil and transportable in the Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). The total investment (1995$) for the LNG option is $17 billion and $13 billion for the GTL option. Both include investments necessary to develop PTU.The results of the economic evaluations, prepared using the Energy Information Administration 1995 Reference Oil Price forecast that anticipates real oil price growth of about 2.4%/yrY indicate that both LNG and GTL project options will be profitable (10% rate of return on investment) for the gas project developers. In addition, economic returns to the PBU and PTU gas producing units will be higher than they would be without gas sales. Also, of the two options, the GTL...