The magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics of bone tumors are described and the clinical utility of MR imaging in patient evaluation is reported. Fifty-two patients with skeletal lesions were examined with a Picker MR imager (0.15-T resistive magnet). Twenty-five patients had primary malignancies, seven had benign bone neoplasms, 15 had skeletal metastases, and five had neoplasm simulators. Forty-five patients had CT scans available for comparison. For demonstrating the extent of tumor in marrow, MR was superior to CT in 33% of cases, about equal to CT in 64%, and inferior to CT in 2%. For delineating the extent of tumor in soft tissue, MR was superior to CT in 38% of cases and about equal to CT in 62%. CT was superior in all cases for demonstrating calcific deposits and pathologic fractures. In four patients with metal prostheses or surgical clips, MR was superior to CT in documenting recurrent tumor because of artifactual degradation of the CT image. Direct sagittal and coronal images from MR permit accurate assessment of the relationship of tumor to adjacent normal structures, including the physis, joints, and neurovascular structures. MR is useful in the evaluation of bone tumors: it is of greatest value in evaluations of the peripheral skeleton, the medullary canal, soft tissues, and postoperative tumor recurrence. With a 0.15-T magnet, MR is less useful in the evaluation of the axial skeleton and cortical bone.

We treated 36 patients with unilateral facet dislocations or fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine at the Mayo Clinic between 1975 and 1986. Adequate records were available for 34: ten patients were treated by open reduction and posterior fusion, and 24 by nonoperative management. Of these, 19 had halo traction followed by halo-thoracic immobilisation, four had a simple cervicothoracic orthosis, and one received no active treatment. Anatomical reduction was achieved more frequently in the operative group (60% compared with 25%). Nonoperative treatment was more likely to result in cervical translation on flexion/extension lateral radiographs, and in significant symptoms. Only 36% of the patients treated by halo traction achieved anatomical alignment; in 25% halo traction failed to achieve or maintain any degree of reduction. During halo-thoracic immobilisation, half of the patients lost some degree of reduction and patient satisfaction with the appliance was low. Open reduction and internal fixation of unilateral facet injuries gave better results. 6

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract