Intraspinal location of central PNET (cPNET) is very rare. We present a case, critically review all publications of primary intraspinal cPNET occurrence and discuss tendencies in clinical presentation. In several previous attempts to summarise, authors often confused cPNET with peripheral PNET (pPNET). cPNET and pPNET are different entities with different immunohistochemical profiles and genetic backgrounds. Clinically, they are both aggressive tumours, but exhibit different characteristics in their local manifestation and metastatic spread. Survival rates are quite similar provided that treatment is applied according to the established protocols. Protocols in cPNET treatment differ from those for pPNET as regards the order of the treatment sub-modalities, specific chemotherapeutic regimen and intensity, radiation dose and its extent and consequently, the side effects. Therefore, failure to distinguish cPNET from pPNET leads to clinical guidance and treatment proposals based on false assumptions, which might effect outcomes. Often, distinguishing between cPNET and pPNET is easy, because they occur in different location. In the case of intraspinal tumour location, however, the differentiation is crucial because both primary cPNET and pPNET can occur intraspinally, even though this is rare. Nowadays, demonstrating the expression of MIC2 glycoprotein by immunocytochemical staining (CD99) showing the specific EWS-FLI1 chimeric gene presence in pPNET, offers an easy way of making a differential diagnosis between cPNET and pPNET.

Patients with syndromic craniosynostosis are at risk for elevated intracranial pressure because of various physiologic and anatomic abnormalities. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of papilledema in syndromic craniosynostosis, to evaluate the results of the treatment, and to examine the risk factors. This is a retrospective study on 84 patients with Apert, Crouzon, or Pfeiffer syndrome. Papilledema was defined as blurring of the margins of the optic disk. The association between clinical symptoms, beaten-copper pattern on skull radiograph, ventricular dilatation on computed tomography scan, and papilledema was assessed. Papilledema was present in 51% of the patients. No relation between specific clinical symptoms and papilledema was found. The significant associations were complex craniosynostosis, exorbitism, and ventricular dilatation. The prevalence of papilledema in patients with Apert, Crouzon, or Pfeiffer syndrome is high, not only before cranial decompression but also after vault expansion. Annual fundoscopy is recommended to screen for papilledema. We consider that early decompressive surgery (within the first year of age) prevents the development of papilledema and, most likely, elevated intracranial pressure.

No abstract

Therapeutic, IV.