1.A meta-analysis of 17 years of literature on erythrocyte Na+/Li+ countertransport (NLCT) and Na+/K+ co-transport (COT) measurements in relation to essential hypertension is presented. The analysis aimed to answer two questions: (i) Which clinical or laboratory variables influence NLCT and COT flux values? (ii) How useful are NLCT and COT measurements as a diagnostic aid in essential hypertension?2. Regression analysis was performed on the mean flux values and relevant clinical and laboratory values. Studies in both normotensive and hypertensive subjects were stratified for variables which showed a significant association with the measured flux. For hypertensive subjects the studies were also stratified for medication. Means of strata were calculated after weighing the mean of a study by the inverse of its own variance and were compared in normotensive as well as hypertensive subjects using a t-test.3.The analysis did not demonstrate systematic effects of laboratory variables for either NLCT or COT. It was found that essential hypertension, family history of hypertension, gender and antihypertensive medication are main determinants for the flux values of both transport systems. After stratification for these determinants, significant differences in weighed mean flux values between normotensive and hypertensive subjects were demonstrated. However, these differences are much smaller than the variance in the weighed mean flux values, suggesting the existence of other unknown variables that strongly affect the flux rates.4.In conclusion, NLCT and COT measurements cannot be of diagnostic use in essential hypertension.
1. Stable urea isotopes can be used to study urea kinetics in humans. The use of stable urea isotopes for studying urea kinetic parameters in humans on a large scale is hampered by the high costs of the labelled material. We devised a urea dilution for measurement of the distribution volume, production rate and clearance of urea in healthy subjects and renal failure patients using the inexpensive single labelled [13C]urea isotope with subsequent analysis by headspace chromatography-isotope ratio MS (GC-IRMS) of the [13C]urea enrichment. 2. The method involves measurement of the molar percentage excess of [13C]urea in plasma samples taken over a 4 h period after an intravenous bolus injection of [13C]urea. During the sample processing procedure, the plasma samples together with calibration samples containing a known molar percentage excess of [13C]urea are acidified with phosphoric acid to remove endogenous CO2, and are subsequently incubated with urease to convert the urea present in the plasma samples into CO2. The 13C enrichment of the generated CO2 is analysed by means of GC-IRMS. This method allows measurement of the molar percentage excess of [13C]urea to an accuracy of 0.02%. 3. Reproducibility studies showed that the sample processing procedure [within-run coefficient of variation (CV) < 2.8% and between-run CV < 8.8%] and the GC-IRMS analysis (within-day CV < 1.3% and between-day CV < 1.3%) could be repeated with good reproducibility. 4. In clinical urea kinetic studies in a healthy subject and in a renal failure patient without residual renal function, reproducible values of the distribution volume, production rate and clearance of urea were determined using minimal amounts of [13C]urea (25-50 mg). 5. Because only low [13C]urea enrichments are needed in this urea dilution method using GC-IRMS analysis, the costs of urea kinetic studies are reduced considerably, especially in patients with renal failure.
In order to find out whether hyperoxaluria can be demonstrated in patients on chronic (twice a week) haemodialysis, a group of 13 patients was investigated. These included one patient with proven primary hyperoxaluria, one suspected of having this disease and 11 patients in whom no information was available as to their oxalate metabolism. Oxalate concentrations in haemodialysate fractions and blood samples, taken before and after dialysis, were determined. The patient with primary hyperoxaluria had a plasma oxalate concentration before dialysis above 100 mumol/l and after dialysis above 25 mumol/l, while the oxalate concentration in haemodialysate at the start of dialysis was above 25 mumol/l and at the end above 10 mumol/l. The patient suspected of hyperoxaluria had similar values. Of the remaining 11 patients, one was shown to exhibit a transient hyperoxaluria, but the others showed a normal oxalate metabolism. A plasma oxalate/creatinine concentration ratio exceeding 0.1, and the calculated total quantity of oxalate removed by dialysis exceeding 2 mmol, also enabled a diagnosis of hyperoxaluria to be made. Hyperoxaluria can still be demonstrated in patients, who because of renal failure are subjected to haemodialysis. Measurements of oxalate in haemodialysate and plasma are valuable in cases where kidney transplantations are considered, especially when the particular patient exhibits hyperoxaluria.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of amino acid (AA) supplementation on the loss and its time course of free AA, during hemodialysis. 2 uremic patients on regular hemodialysis received an increasing number of essential AA tablets during the dialysis. The loss and its time course of 6 essential and 7 nonessential free AA during dialysis was assayed in the dialysate. The loss per dialysis treatment of the administered essential AA increased almost proportionally with the doses of AA tablets. For the nonessential AA, no definite relationship between doses of AA tablets and losses was observed. At all levels of supplementation, methionine was retained best: 90% of the amount present in the tablets. Threonine showed the lowest retention: 15-55%.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.