The effects of the repeated administration of milnacipran, a serotonin (5-HT)-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), on the functional status of somatodendritic 5-HT1A receptors, and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors were explored using electrophysiological approaches in rats. In-vitro electrophysiological recordings in the dorsal raphe nucleus showed that 5-HT inhibited the firing of serotonergic neurones, and the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexane carboxamide (WAY 100635), reversed the inhibitory effect of 5-HT. The potency of 5-HT to inhibit the firing of serotonergic neurones was slightly attenuated after 3 days of treatment with milnacipran (30 mg/kg, p.o., twice daily), and significantly attenuated after 7 or 14 days treatment at the same dose. The tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine, did not significantly modify the inhibitory effect of 5-HT. After 7 days treatment at 30 mg/kg, p.o., once daily, milnacipran reduced the potency of 5-HT to inhibit the firing of serotonergic neurones, whereas the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fluvoxamine and fluoxetine (60 and 30 mg/kg, p.o., once daily, respectively), did not modify it under these conditions. Treatment with milnacipran (30 mg/kg, p.o., twice daily) for 14 days did not change the inhibition of the CA1 field potential in rat hippocampal slices by 5-HT. These data suggest that somatodendritic 5-HT1A receptors, but not postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors, rapidly desensitize in response to the repeated administration of milnacipran.
Objectives
To reassess the safety and efficacy of once-weekly teriparatide 56.5 μg in osteoporosis patients with a high fracture risk.
Methods
This postmarketing observational study was conducted at 72 weeks according to the package insert. Of the 3573 Japanese osteoporosis patients in the safety analysis set, 91.80% were women, the mean age was 78.1 years, and 69.89% had a history of prevalent fragility fractures, indicating that a high proportion of patients at high risk of fracture were enrolled.
Results
Persistence with weekly teriparatide treatment was 59.36%, and 38.95% at 24 and 72 weeks, respectively. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 898 patients (25.13%), and serious ADRs were reported in 26 patients (0.73%). The most frequent ADRs were nausea, vomiting, and headache. The cumulative incidence of new vertebral fractures 72 weeks after the start of treatment was 3.31%. Increases in the bone mineral density were observed in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and proximal femur. The serum levels of the bone formation markers, procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and bone-type alkaline phosphatase, increased slightly at 24 weeks and then decreased to baseline levels. At 24 and 72 weeks, the bone resorption markers, serum cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen and urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, were the same as or slightly lower than at baseline. Visual analogue scale scores for low back pain also decreased.
Conclusions
The present results showed that once-weekly teriparatide may also be useful for osteoporosis patients with a high risk of fracture.
-The effects of oxiracetam on the reduction of brain metabolism induced by focal cerebral ischemia were investigated by measuring local cerebral glucose uti lization (LCGU) in rats 24 hr after left middle cerebral artery occlusion. Focal cere bral ischemia reduced LCGU in the entire ipsilateral cortex, the greatest reduction being in the lateral parts of the frontoparietal cortex. LCGU was slightly reduced in the contralateral cortex; this reduction was considered to be caused by diaschisis. Ox iracetam was administered intraperitoneally for 3 days prior to middle cerebral artery occlusion. In the ipsilateral cortex, LCGU reduction was minimized in the ischemic center areas by oxiracetam at a dose of 400 mg/kg and in more extensive areas, by a dose of 800 mg/kg. Moreover, oxiracetam at a dose of 800 mg/kg enhanced metabo lism impaired by diaschisis in the caudal areas of the contralateral cortex. These find ings suggest that oxiracetam minimizes the reduction of brain function induced by ischemia and may therefore be useful in the treatment of cerebrovascular disease.The pharmacological actions of oxiracetam are similar to those of other pyrrolidone de rivatives, including piracetam, aniracetam and pramiracetam. Oxiracetam and other pyrroli done derivatives have been reported to im prove memory and learning ability in normal animals (1) and to prevent amnesia and the decrease in brain acetylcholine level induced by scopolamine and electroshock in rats (2 4). Oxiracetam and piracetam stimulate high affinity choline uptake in the rat hippocampus (5). Thus, the effects of pyrrolidone deriva tives may be related to the enhancement of brain cholinergic mechanisms. In addition, ox iracetam and other pyrrolidone derivatives have been shown to augment hippocampal long-term potentiation in rats (6) and guinea pigs (7,8). These investigations suggest that pyrrolidone derivatives enhance cerebral func tion in normal brain and protect it in impaired brain. Since we have recently found that ox iracetam protects rats and mice against cere bral hypoxia, we expected to find that ox iracetam had protective effects against cere bral ischemia in this experiment.Focal cerebral ischemia induced by middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion (9) is a use ful model (9, 10) for studying ischemic brain damage, as well as cerebral blood flow (11, 12), energy metabolism (13), and neurotrans mitters (14,15). Sokoloff (16) showed that cerebral functional activity was closely coupled to energy metabolism, especially glucose con sumption. In this study, we investigated
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.