No abstract

Our findings suggest that shoulder exercises with trunk rotation in this study may be effective in patients who have difficulty in enhancing LT activity and suppressing excessive activation of the UT or in cases in which a decreased scapular external rotation or posterior tilt is observed.

The present study aimed to clarify the effects of the trunk position on muscle stiffness that reflects elongation of the lumbar erector spinae and lumbar multifidus muscles using ultrasonic shear wave elastography (SWE). MethodsThe study included ten healthy men. The shear elastic modulus of the left lumbar erector spinae and lumbar multifidus muscles were evaluated using ultrasonic SWE. Measurement postures for the left lumbar erector spinae muscle were (1) prone position (Rest), ( 2) sitting position with the trunk flexed (Flexion), (3) the Flexion position adding right trunk lateral flexion (Flexion-Lateral Flexion), and (4) the Flexion position adding right trunk rotation (Flexion-Rotation 1). The left lumbar multifidus muscle were measured in positions (1)-(3), and (5) the Flexion position adding left trunk rotation (Flexion-Rotation 2). ResultsThe shear elastic modulus of the lumbar erector spinae muscle in the Flexion-Lateral Flexion position was significantly higher than that in the Rest, Flexion, or Flexion-Rotation 1 positions. Shear elastic modulus of the lumbar multifidus muscle was similar in the Flexion, Flexion-Lateral Flexion, and Flexion-Rotation 2 positions, but significantly lower in the Rest position. ConclusionsThe results of the present study suggest that the lumbar erector spinae muscle is stretched effectively in the position adding trunk contralateral lateral flexion to flexion. The results also indicate that the lumbar multifidus muscle, which does not appear to be affected by adding trunk 4 contralateral lateral flexion or ipsilateral rotation to flexion, is stretched effectively in the trunk flexion position.

No abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of six weeks of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) on the strength and muscle mass of the infraspinatus muscle. Twenty non-athletes (age: 24±3.4 years, height: 171.5±5.6 cm, mass: 65.2±8.1 kg) were randomly classified into two groups, an electrical muscle stimulation group (EMS group) and a control group (CON group). The EMS group completed a total of 18 20- min EMS sessions, three times per week over a period of six weeks, while the CON group received no intervention. The muscle thicknesses of both the infraspinatus and the deltoid muscles, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the whole infraspinatus muscle, and the isometric and isokinetic peak torques of shoulder external rotations were measured before and after intervention. It was found that the muscle thickness of the superior infraspinatus (Pre 0.92±0.19 cm, Post 0.99±0.16 cm, p=0.02) and the CSA (Pre 10.99±1.32 cm, Post 11.99±1.02 cm, p=0.03) significantly increased in the EMS group. This study demonstrated that EMS of the infraspinatus muscle over a period of six weeks resulted in hypertrophy of the infraspinatus muscle.