We examined the incidence of long P wave duration in lead II and increased P terminal force in lead V1 (PTFV1), and their relationship to electrophysiological findings of atrial muscle in 34 patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Patients were divided into three groups: Group I, consisting of 20 patients with various cardiac arrhythmias other than SSS and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who served as controls; Group II, consisting of 18 patients with SSS but without PAF; and Group III consisted of 16 patients with SSS and PAF. P wave duration was significantly longer in Group III (122 +/- 11 ms, mean +/- SD, P < 0.0001) and Group II (111 +/- 15 ms, P < 0.002) than in Group I (98 +/- 10 ms). PTFV1 was greater in Group III (0.052 +/- 0.025 ms) than in Group I (0.028 +/- 0.011 ms, P < 0.05). P wave duration and PTFV1 had significantly and/or borderline correlations with longest duration of right atrial electrograms (r = 0.84, P < 0.0001 and 0.47, P < 0.02, respectively), maximal number of fragmented deflections of atrial electrograms (r = 0.69, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.51, P < 0.02, respectively), repetitive atrial firing zone (RAFZ) (r = 0.81, P < 0.0001 and 0.48, P < 0.05, respectively) and fragmented atrial activity zone (FAAZ)(r = 0.53, P < 0.01 and r = 0.45, P = 0.06, respectively). We concluded that long P wave duration and increased PTFV1 are electrocardiographic indicators for coexistence of electrophysiological abnormalities in the atria in SSS without recognizable heart disease.

No abstract

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) frequently coexists with coronary artery disease (CAD). The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is widely used for the screening for PAD. Low ABI is associated with short-term clinical outcomes in patients receiving coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. However, there is no report to examine the relationship between lower ABI and long-term clinical outcomes after DES implantation. Thus, we investigated the clinical long-term impact of low ABI after DES implantation. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 181 CAD patients treated with DES from April 2010 to March 2013 in our institute. Based on ABI values, we divided the subjects into the low-ABI group(ABI [ 6 1 _ T D $ D I F F ] < 0.9, n = 29) and the normal ABI group(0.9 [ 6 2 _ T D $ D I F F ] ABI < 1.4, n = 152). The incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR), all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and any repeat revascularization, were compared between the 2 groups. Results: During the median follow-up period of 43 months, the incidences of TLR, all-cause mortality, and MACCE were significantly higher in the low ABI group than in the normal ABI group (TLR: 41.4% vs 9.9%, p [ 6 3 _ T D $ D I F F ] < 0.001, all-cause mortality: 31.0% vs 3.9%, p [ 6 3 _ T D $ D I F F ] < 0.001, MACCE: 48.3% vs 11.2%, p [ 6 3 _ T D $ D I F F ] < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Low ABI may predict poor long-term outcomes, including TLR, in CAD patients treated with DES.

No abstract

Repetitive atrial firing (RAF), marked fragmentation of atrial activity (FAA), and interatrial conduction delay (CD) have been shown to be electrophysiological features of the atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Moreover, it has been observed that atrial extrastimuli are more likely to induce AF when delivered from the right atrial appendage (RAA) than from the distal coronary sinus (CSd). We examined the electrophysiological properties of the atrial muscle by CS and RAA stimulation in patients with paroxysmal AF. Patients were divided into two groups: group I, consisting of 18 patients with clinical paroxysmal AF; and group II, consisting of 22 patients with various cardiac arrhythmias in which the substrate does not exist in the atrium. In group I, the following values of electrophysiological parameters of the atrium indicated that AF was more likely to be induced during RAA pacing than CSd pacing: atrial effective refractory period (RAA vs CSd: 201 +/- 28 ms vs 240 +/- 35 ms, P < 0.001), RAF zone (16 +/- 25 ms vs 0 +/- 0 ms, P < 0.03), FAA zone (38 +/- 37 ms vs 5 +/- 19 ms, P < 0.01), maximum interatrial conduction time (144 +/- 19 ms vs 93 +/- 19 ms, P < 0.0001) and CD zone (53 +/- 21 ms vs 9 +/- 18 ms, P < 0.0001). The values of the electrophysiological parameters of the atrium evaluated by CSd pacing in group I patients were not significantly different from those in group II patients. In conclusion, when coronary sinus stimulation is performed, electrophysiological properties of the atrium in patients with AF show a significant decrease in atrial vulnerability compared to stimulation from RAA and also show similar values to those in patients without AF. It might be suggested that the left posterior or posterolateral atrium is electrophysiologically stable even in patients with paroxysmal AF.