BackgroundShelf acetabuloplasty has been applied to secondary osteoarthritis of the hip due to congenital dislocation or acetabular dysplasia; however, there are few reports on the long-term outcomes of this operation. Here, we aimed to investigate the long-term effects of our shelf acetabuloplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip in adults.MethodsOutcomes for 28 hips (7 with pre-arthrosis, 21 with initial stage of arthrosis) were retrospectively reviewed clinically and radiologically at a minimum of 20 years after operation. Mean age of the patients at operation was 34 years (range 17–54 years), and the mean follow-up period was 25 years (range 20–32 years).ResultsMean Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score improved from 76 points preoperatively to 82 points, and mean pain score improved from 24 points preoperatively to 33 points at 20 years. Mean Sharp angle improved from 51° preoperatively to 37° immediately after the operation. Similarly, the mean center-edge angle improved from −4° to 38°, and the mean acetabulum head index improved from 52 to 99%. More than 50% of the hips showed no change in joint space width at 20 years. Survival rates were 100% at 10 years, 93% at 20 years and 71% at 32 years, with conversion to total hip replacement as the endpoint.ConclusionLong-term outcomes of our shelf acetabuloplasty were comparable to other reports, and the clinical outcomes and survivorship revealed positive long-term effects of our procedure over approximately 20 years.
In an attempt to preserve proximal femoral bone stock and achieve a better fit in smaller femora, especially in the Asian population, several new shorter stem designs have become available. We investigated the torque to periprosthetic femoral fracture of the Exeter short stem compared with the conventional length Exeter stem in a Sawbone model. Forty-two stems; 21 shorter and 21 conventional stems both with three different offsets were cemented in a composite Sawbone model and torqued to fracture. Results showed that Sawbone femurs break at a statistically significantly lower torque to failure with a shorter compared to conventional-length Exeter stem of the same offset. Both standard and short-stem designs are safe to use as the torque to failure is 7-10 times that seen in activities of daily living.
Objective. Pain catastrophizing is an important pain-related variable, but its impact on patients with osteoarthritis is uncertain. The aim of the current study was to determine whether pain catastrophizing was independently associated with quality of life (QOL) in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Design. Cross-sectional study conducted between June 2017 and February 2018. Setting. Tertiary center. Subjects. Seventy consecutively enrolled patients with severe hip osteoarthritis who had experienced pain for six or more months that limited daily function, and who were scheduled for primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty. Methods. QOL was measured using the EuroQOL-5 Dimensions questionnaire, the Japanese Orthopedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire, and a dissatisfaction visual analog scale. Covariates included pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, range of hip motion, and gait speed. The variables were subjected to multivariate analysis with each QOL scale. Results. The median age was 68 years, and the median Pain Catastrophizing Scale score was 26. In multiple regression analysis, pain catastrophizing, pain intensity in both hips, pain intensity on the affected side, hip flexion on the affected side, and gait speed were independently correlated with QOL. Conclusions. Pain catastrophizing was independently associated with each QOL scale in preoperative patients with severe hip osteoarthritis. Pain catastrophizing had either the strongest or second strongest effect on QOL, followed by pain intensity.
The use of large body polished tapered cemented stems for neck of femur fractures increases the torque to failure in a biomechanical model and therefore is likely to reduce late periprosthetic fracture risk in this vulnerable cohort.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.