We investigate the metal-insulator transition (MIT) of the osmium pyrochlore oxide Cd 2 Os 2 O 7 through transport and magnetization measurements. The MIT and a magnetic transition to the all-in/all-out (AIAO) order occur simultaneously at 227 K. We propose a mechanism based on a Lifshitz transition induced by the AIAO magnetic order probably via strong spin-orbit couplings in the specific semimetallic band structure. It is suggested, moreover, that two observed puzzles, a finite conductivity near T = 0 and an emergence of weak ferromagnetic moments, are not bulk properties but originate at magnetic domain walls between two kinds of AIAO domains.

Spin-transfer torque (STT) and spin–orbit torque (SOT) are spintronic phenomena allowing magnetization manipulation using electrical currents. Beyond their fundamental interest, they allow developing new classes of magnetic memories and logic devices, in particular based on domain wall (DW) motion. In this work, we report the study of STT-driven DW motion in ferrimagnetic manganese nickel nitride (Mn4–x Ni x N) films, in which magnetization and angular momentum compensation can be obtained by the fine adjustment of the Ni content. Large domain wall velocities, approaching 3000 m/s, are measured for Ni compositions close to the angular momentum compensation point. The reversal of the DW motion direction, observed when the compensation composition is crossed, is related to the change of direction of the angular momentum with respect to that of the spin polarization. This is confirmed by the results of ab initio band structure calculations.

Ferrimagnetic Mn4N is a promising candidate for current-induced domain wall motion assisted by spin-transfer and spin–orbit torques. Mn4N can be doped to have perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) and a small spontaneous magnetization. However, the origin of the PMA of Mn4N has yet to be fully understood. Here, we investigated the relationship between the ratios of the perpendicular lattice constant c to the in-plane lattice constant a of Mn4N epitaxial thin films (c/a) and the uniaxial magnetic anisotropic constant (Ku) in Mn4N thin films grown on MgO(001), SrTiO3(001), and LaAlO3(001) substrates. The lattice mismatches between Mn4N and these substrates are approximately −6%, −0.1%, and +2%, respectively. All the Mn4N thin films had PMA and in-plane tensile distortion (c/a < 1) regardless of the Mn4N thickness and substrate. Although the magnitude of c/a depended on several factors, such as the Mn4N layer thickness and substrate, we found a strong correlation between c/a and Ku; Ku increased markedly when c/a deviated from 1. This result indicates that the origin of PMA is tensile distortion in Mn4N films; hence, it might be possible to control the magnitude of Ku by tuning c/a through the Mn4N layer thickness and the substrate.

Ferrimagnets close to the magnetic compensation are excellent candidates to spin-torque-based spintronic applications, as their small magnetizations allow lowering switching currents. Here, we studied the magnetic compensation of Mn4 − xNixN epitaxial films by performing x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) measurements at the L2,3 absorption edges of Mn and Ni atoms and compared them with those of Ni3FeN films. The XAS spectrum of the Ni3FeN films exhibits shoulders at approximately 2 eV above the Ni L2,3 main peaks, originating from orbitals hybridization between Ni 3d at face-centered (II) sites and N 2p at body-centered sites. However, such shoulders are not observed at the Ni L2,3 edges of the Mn4 − xNixN films (x = 0.1 and 0.25). These results indicate that the orbitals of Ni atoms do not hybridize with those of N atoms. Hence, Ni atoms preferentially occupy corner (I) sites, where hybridization is weak because of the relatively long distance between Ni at I sites and N atoms. The XMCD signals of Mn and Ni atoms reverse sign between x = 0.1 and 0.25. This shows that the directions of the magnetic moments carried by Mn and Ni atoms are reversed, indicating that the magnetic compensation occurs in the range 0.1 < x < 0.25. In addition, the signs of Mn(I) XMCD signals are opposite to those of Mn(II) and Ni for each composition. Thus, the magnetic moments of Ni atoms are aligned parallel to those of Mn(II) regardless of whether x is below or above the compensation point.

No abstract