Although thiopurine S‐methyltransferase (TPMT) genotyping to guide thiopurine dosing is common in the pediatric cancer population, limited data exist on TPMT testing implementation in diverse, multidisciplinary settings. We established TPMT testing (genotype and enzyme) with clinical decision support, provider/patient education, and pharmacist consultations in a tertiary medical center and collected data over 3 years. During this time, 834 patients underwent 873 TPMT tests (147 (17%) genotype, 726 (83%) enzyme). TPMT tests were most commonly ordered for gastroenterology, rheumatology, dermatology, and hematology/oncology patients (661 of 834 patients (79.2%); 580 outpatient vs. 293 inpatient; P < 0.0001). Thirty‐nine patients had both genotype and enzyme tests (n = 2 discordant results). We observed significant differences between TPMT test use and characteristics in a diverse, multispecialty environment vs. a pediatric cancer setting, which led to unique implementation needs. As pharmacogenetic implementations expand, disseminating lessons learned in diverse, real‐world environments will be important to support routine adoption.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine the optimal daily dose of voriconazole required to achieve therapeutic trough concentrations in children 1 month to 18 years of age. The secondary objective was to analyze the association between voriconazole trough concentrations and clinical and microbiological outcomes, toxicity, and mortality. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review (October 2009 to August 2012) of pediatric oncology/bone marrow transplant patients with proven or probable invasive fungal infections treated with intravenous or oral voriconazole. Patients were excluded if they were older than 18 years of age, had no voriconazole concentrations drawn during the study period, or received voriconazole prior to the study period. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were reviewed; 11 patients met all criteria for inclusion. There were 6 males and 5 females, with a median age of 8 years (range: 0.8–14.8) and a median weight of 27 kg (range: 9–74). Doses were adjusted to a median 6 mg/kg/dose (range: 3–8.7 mg/kg/dose) given every 8 (n = 5) to 12 (n = 6) hours; dose regimens varied greatly. All but 1 child achieved a voriconazole trough concentration above 1 mg/L; 7 children had a trough concentration above 2 mg/L. The median time to achieve a therapeutic trough concentration was 11 days (range: 6–37 days). Therapy failed for 4 of 11 patients, including 3 of the 4 youngest patients (p=0.022). Three of the 4 for whom therapy failed also had voriconazole trough concentrations less than 2 mg/L; this did not reach statistical significance. Voriconazole therapy was discontinued in 2 patients due to toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that voriconazole pharmacokinetics vary greatly in pediatric oncology/bone marrow transplant patients. “Optimal” doses varied over nearly a 3-fold range. Younger patients may be at greater risk of poor outcomes and may require additional monitoring and dose adjustment.
Sickle cell disease is a chronic and life-limiting disorder. Approximately 100,000 Americans are affected with sickle cell disease with most being African Americans. Newborn screening for sickle cell is available in the United States, leading to early detection and management of the disease beginning in infancy. According to the 2014 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute sickle cell disease guidelines, supportive care has been primary management of sickle cell disease, with hydroxyurea being the only FDA-approved, disease-modifying pharmacotherapy available and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant the only cure. Since 2017, three new disease-modifying therapies have been approved by the FDA: L-glutamine, crizanlizumab, and voxelotor. This review will discuss pertinent trials, dosing, interactions, side effects, access, cost, and their role in sickle cell management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.