Background-We sought to compare published methods to an alternative approach ascertaining cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block during atrial flutter ablation. Methods and Results-In 39 consecutive patients who underwent an atrial flutter ablation procedure, a 24-pole mapping catheter was positioned so that 2 adjacent dipoles were bracketing the targeted CTI line of block (LOB), with proximal dipoles lateral to the LOB and distal dipoles in the coronary sinus. Two pacing sites were lateral (positions A and B) and 2 were septal (positions C and D) to the LOB, with locations A and D closest to the LOB. A resulting CTI block was accepted when 3 criteria were fulfilled: (1) complete reversal of the right atrial depolarization on the 24-pole catheter when pacing in the coronary sinus, (2) conduction delays from A to D greater than from B to D, and (3) conduction delays from D to A greater than from C to A. A successful CTI block was obtained in all patients. Before CTI block was obtained, a progressive CTI conduction delay was observed in 11 patients (28.2%). During the procedure, the 3 criteria defined above were either all present or all absent. Conclusions-This study establishes that reversal of the atrial depolarization sequence up to the LOB is a definitive and mandatory criteria of successful atrial flutter ablation. (Circulation. 1999;100:2507-2513.)

Our study suggests that the accuracy of algorithms relying on the 12-lead ECG depends on AP locations as defined in the algorithms and on the number of AP sites. The accuracy tends to be lower when delta wave polarity is not included in the algorithm's architecture. This should be considered when using these algorithms or when building new ones.

No abstract

Our study suggests that interobserver reproducibility of only bipolar electrograms interval measurements at sites of radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular accessory pathway is poor, which limits the reliability of bipolar criteria to predict a successful ablation site.