Backgrounds: Although the OCT biometer using individual refractive index is available, comparisons of measurement value and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation error with other SS-OCT biometers are not known. Objectives: To compare the new SS-OCT biometer ARGOS (OCTB1), which uses individual refractive indices to measure axial length, with the IOLMaster 700 (OCTB2) and OA-2000 (OLCR), which use equivalent refractive index. Method: Six hundred and twenty-two eyes of 622 patients who had been diagnosed with cataract were enrolled in the study. Among the 158 eyes that had undergone cataract surgery, the postoperative refractive error was evaluated using the Haigis formula. Results: The axial length measured by the OCTB1 showed a proportional bias in comparison with the other two biometers and a fixed bias in eyes with an axial length ≥26 mm. No significant difference was found in the median absolute refractive prediction error (p = 0.3278). However, in eyes with an axial length ≥26 mm, the OCTB1 showed myopic error compared with the other two biometers (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In eyes with long axial length, when the conventional IOL calculation was optimized with the equivalent refractive index-based instrument, we need to consider that IOL calculation using OCTB1 tends to cause slightly myopic refractive prediction error.

No abstract

No abstract

ABSTRACT.Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of the arched blade for making clear corneal incisions in cataract surgery. Methods: This prospective study comprised 112 eyes of 74 patients scheduled for cataract surgery. Temporal clear corneal incisions were made with either a 3.2-mm conventional flat blade or the arched blade. The choice of knife was randomly assigned. Two surgeons, one with substantial cataract surgery experience and the other with less experience, performed the surgery. Corneal topography and aberration were examined pre-and postoperatively. The degree of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and high order aberration was analysed. The selfsealing ability of the wound was also compared between both blades. Results: For the less experienced surgeon, the degree of SIA was significantly higher with the 3.2-mm flat blade than with the 3.2-mm arched blade as measured at any time during postoperative follow-up. For the more experienced surgeon, the degree of high order aberration increased significantly with the 3.2-mm flat blade. The incision's self-sealing ability was significantly better when the wound was made with the arched blade rather than with the flat blade. Conclusion: The arched blade proved to be effective in reducing surgically induced astigmatism and high order aberration in cataract surgery, particularly when used by the less experienced surgeon. Using the arched blade should lead to better wound self-sealing and, therefore, safer surgical results.