The present research on Creativity: Learning Style or Didactic Strategy? It aims to identify the impact of Learning Styles and Didactic Strategies on Creativity. Teachers should resort to practices that make them obtain good results, projecting a quality training, this leads to being an active person, with social activities that make the student have a good and increasingly better participation in the process of teaching-learning, where it is capable of transmitting a discipline to overcome difficulties. (Márquez, 2005). Some items of the learning styles of the ILP-R questionnaire (SCHMECK) were used, from which the most relevant ones were selected since they could enrich the present study. The instrument that was applied presented a cronbach alpha of .85, the results were analyzed with the STATISTIC statistical package. The type of research is quantitative, the instrument was carried out in four sections, where the general data is found, and 3 research axes: Learning Styles, Didactic Strategy and Creativity. As main results it was found that Learning Styles and Didactic Strategies are considered to have an impact for the student to generate Creativity.
The main objective of this study is to develop a technique to evaluate the cognitive dispersion that exists in the contents and subjects of the curricula. The problem perceived by the authors is that learning is difficult when students have a greater diversity of subjects in their daily classes, when there are too many subjects per course or curricular axis and when they have fewer hours/class per day, which probably represents them greater cognitive complexity due to the dispersion of the contents to be learned. The experience of the authors in the design of the curricula has implied assessing the cognitive dispersion of multiple cases and the role of academic planners in systematically avoiding it. This research collects the methodology and experience of other studies in various areas and applies them in order to obtain a Cognitive Dispersion Index that allows us to evaluate this aspect when designing the study programs.
The main objective of this article was to compare the perception that the college student has with the scholar learning barriers. The methodology that was used was the quantitative, observational, transversal, descriptive and comparative. The compilation of this info was carried out through an instrument with 11 learning barriers questions of the academic environment, with 320 surveys in phase 3 of the Covid-19 Pandemic, applied to the faculties of Ciencia, Educación y Humanidades, Sistemas, Ingeniería, Mercadotecnia and Jurisprudencia of the Universidad Autónoma of Coahuila, the method of sampling that was utilized was not probabilistic through the strategy of sampling for convenience. The statistical techniques that were applied were the descriptive through frequencies and percentages, comparative with Kruskal-wallis method for independent samples and Mann Whitney U for two independent samples. The contribution of the study lies in that the students from faculty de Sistemas differ from the ones of the faculties of Mercadotecnia, Educación, Ingeniería and jurisprudencia in that they consider in large extent that the educational and pedagogical practices during the hybrid modality for the COVID-19 Lockdown, has been a learning barrier.
The article exposes important aspects of the usage of technologies of information and communication related to multiple intelligences and organizational leadership.The objective of this article was to explore the TIC’s dimensions, multiple intelligences, and organizational leadership. The methodology used quantitative, transversal descriptive and correlational. The compilation of the information was through a questionary that measured the three dimensions mentioned. The sample was confirmed by 315 students, the sampling used was no probabilistic, through the strategy of convenience sampling. The statistics techniques that were used were descriptive statistic, correlational and factorial. The contribution of the study lies in the statistic empiric evidence that allows to confirm that use of the TIC benefit to the multiple intelligences and to the organizational leadership. It is denoted that the positive correlation with variables of the use of the TIC in relation with the multiple intelligences linguistic-verbal, logical-mathematical, space, interpersonal and with the organizational leadership, it can be said that the TIC integrated with multiple intelligences and the use of organizational leadership propitiate to be a leader with technological intelligence.
An investigation was developed with the aim of elucidating the research processes that students follow at different educational levels to develop engineering projects within the Feria Nacional de Ciencias e Ingenierías de Coahuila, with the database used by the Consejo Estatal de Ciencia y Tecnología de Coahuila (COECyT), which consists of 135 projects from which 311 cases were obtained, evaluated by 62 expert researchers designated by the COECyT. Given that the evaluation formats were in Likert-type scales, they were transformed to a standardized centesimal scale and analyzed with statistics of central tendency, dispersion, correlation and discriminant analysis. The conclusion indicates that the development of student projects has original processes that are not subject to a strict methodology, rather, students develop their projects with the help of teachers proposing and developing solutions step by step, in each stage of the investigation, except in the formal requirements of the contest. We can also affirm that the projects have an average methodological identity of 50% in each educational level, according to the discriminant analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.