No abstract

Background The issue of reluctance towards vaccination is becoming more worrisome. Health care workers (HCWs) are the primary point of contact with individuals who make decisions about vaccination. Therefore, it is crucial that HCWs receive sufficient training and periodic updates. The main objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the HCWs’ training needs in vaccination and vaccine uptake. Methods In February 2022, a search was conducted on MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. The search included papers written in English, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, French and Romanian, with a publication date ranging from 1 January 2011 to 24 February 2022 and conducted in Europe. To assess the methodological quality of the papers, the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies was utilized. Results The search of scientific literature yielded 640 outcomes on PubMed, 556 on Scopus and 15 on Google Scholar, for a total of 1211 records. After eliminating duplicates, screening titles and abstracts and evaluating the full text of the articles, only 25 of them were found suitable for inclusion. The studies’ overall quality ranged from moderate to good. The majority of the research emphasized the need for improved knowledge of vaccine-preventable diseases, vaccine efficacy, immunization schedules and vaccine adverse effects. Conclusions It is vital to prioritize educational programmes on vaccinology and vaccine hesitancy for HCWs, with the objective of improving their knowledge, awareness and attitudes. Addressing the diversity of educational backgrounds, roles and training requirements of HCWs involved in vaccination across Europe is a critical issue that must be tackled for future initiatives.

Background Influenza is a major cause of morbidity, mortality and exacerbation of extant chronic disease worldwide. Influenza vaccination is thus fundamental to reduce the burden of disease. In this study, we describe the trend of influenza vaccination coverage in the seasons 2010/11–2020/21 among children aged < 2, 2–4 and 5–8 in Italy. Methods We analyzed the trend of influenza vaccination coverage in the pediatric population in Italy from the 2010/11 to the 2020/21 season at national and regional level and observed the incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI) in the pediatric population between 2010/11 and 2020/21. Results In the period 2010/11–2019/20 the highest value of coverage (4.5%) was reached in the age group 2–4 and 5–8 (season 2010/11 and 2011/12, respectively), while the lowest belonged to the < 2 group (1.1% in the season 2015/16). In the season 2020/2021 all the age groups reported a substantial increase of coverage compared with the previous season. The highest value (19.0%) was reported in the age group 2–4, followed by the group 5–8 and <  2 (13.1 and 9.2%, respectively). Considering the rates of annual ILI cases, the highest value for the 0–4 age group was 18.5% in the 2011/12 season; for the 5–14 age group, the highest value was 27.7% in the 2010/11 season. Conclusions Over the past 11 years pediatric influenza vaccination coverage in Italy has been low, with relevant differences across regions and seasons, albeit a general increase in coverage has been observed in the 2020/21 season. Universal influenza vaccination for children should be considered as a priority for the high incidence in this age group. Further research is needed to improve knowledge and comparability of coverage rates, and to identify the best practices for organizational models of delivery which can support the improvement of trends, the acceptability and accessibility by parents and awareness in stakeholders and decision makers.

Background Microplastics (MPs) are defined as small particles less than 5 mm in size occuring in the environment as a consequence of plastic pollution. MPs are classified into primary MPs, which are created for industrial uses, and secondary MPs, that derive from the degradation of larger plastic items. With the global increase in plastic production, MPs have become widely distributed in the natural ecosystems and have been charged with causing several detrimental effects on both the environment and on human health. Moreover, plastics often include additives to improve their properties, which may produce additional toxic substances. Humans can be exposed to MPs through different pathways, including ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize whether inhaled microplastics and plastic additives have negative effects on human health. Methods MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science were searched starting from December 2021. The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies were primary studies which reported the effects of inhaled MPs on the respiratory system. Appropriate quality assessment tools were used according to the study design of primary studies. Results 38 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were conducted in vitro, while there was a scarcity of papers that investigated the effects of MPs in population cohorts. Preliminary results show that MPs can induce pro-inflammatory or pro-carcinogenic effects by different mechanisms, depending on particles’ concentration, size, type and surface charge. Conclusions Literature has underlined several negative health concerns resulting from the absorption of microplastics and plastic additives. By gathering this information, this systematic review sheds light on the possible threats of MPs inhalation to human health and discusses whether an implementation of new public health policies for the foreseeable future is needed. Key messages • Inhalation is a major route of exposure to microplastics. • Inhaled microplastics or plastic additives may have detrimental effects on human health, promoting respiratory diseases or carcinogenic processes.

The COVID-19 pandemic called for a reorganisation of the methods for providing health services. The aim of this paper is to describe the organisational model implemented by one of Rome’s Local Health Units (LHU), ASL Roma 1, for the “at-home COVID-19 vaccination campaign” dedicated to a target population and to outline data related to vaccination coverage stratified by health districts. A cross-sectional study was designed to describe the strategies implemented by LHU to deliver at-home vaccination programmes. People eligible for the at-home vaccination programme included patients living in the area of the LHU, being assisted by the district home care centre or not transportable or individuals with social situations that make traveling difficult. Priority for vaccination was given to (I) age > 80 years, (II) ventilated patients with no age limit, (III) very seriously disabled people with no age limit. Patients’ data were acquired from regional and LHU databases. From 5 February until the 16 May, 6127 people got at least one dose of Pfizer-Biontech Comirnaty® vaccine, while 5278 (86.14%) completed the necessary two doses. The highest number of vaccines was administered during the first week of April, reaching 1296 doses overall. The number of vaccines administered were similar across the districts. The average number of people vaccinated at home was 6 per 1000 inhabitants in the LHU. This model proved to be extremely complex but effective, reaching satisfying results in terms of vaccination coverage.