Decomposition of livestock manure produces gaseous ammonia. Dietary manipulation is one means to reduce N in manure and ammonia volatilization. The effects of dietary crude protein concentration on N intake, N and urinary urea-N excretion, and ammonia volatilization were measured. Eight Holstein heifers (body weight = 260 to 488 kg) were fed a total mixed ration containing either 9.6 or 11.0% crude protein in a crossover design. Oatlage and concentrate were fed at 77:23 (dry matter basis), and soybean meal was used to alter total dietary crude protein. Seven-day adjustment periods preceded 5-d collection periods. Indwelling urinary catheters were inserted 2 d prior to the collection periods. Daily feces and acidified urine were collected, stirred, and subsampled for total Kjeldahl N, urinary urea N, dry matter, P, K, and ash. Urine collection tubes were split during period 2 to allow for collection of unacidified samples for urea N and total N determinations. Unacidified urine and fecal samples were combined (1:1.3) for collection of volatilized ammonia. Remaining slurries were extracted for total and urea N. Increased dietary crude protein concentration increased N intake, N excretion, urea-N excretion, and N excreted in the urine by the heifers. Dietary manipulation of N intake by reduction of 14.0% (dry matter basis) resulted in a 28.1% decrease in ammonia emission and decreases in the urea N, total N, and percentage N excreted in the urine of 29.6, 19.8, and 7.4%, respectively. Ammonia volatilization was dependent on N quantity and form in the urine.
Few data are available on the ammonia emissions of large-scale outdoor animal facilities in arid climates such as those found in California's San Joaquin Valley. Passive samplers provide an ideal tool for studying such large and heterogeneous area sources, because they are inexpensive, portable, and fully self-contained. UC Davis passive ammonia samplers incorporate modifications on a previous design, the Willems Badge, for ease of analysis. Citric acid was chosen as a coating medium though it performed as well as oxalic, sulfuric, and tartaric acids. Zefluor PTFE prefilters were used instead of Teflo though both showed the same resistance to diffusion. Citric acid-coated filters were stable for up to 10 weeks, though more so if stored in Petri dishes rather than in the sampling cassettes themselves. The most effective sampler position was found to be in a face-down configuration fixed into the wind to avoid debris and sensitivity to wind shifts. A new method of rinsing the filters within the cassettes by dropwise elution proved highly effective, with 85% of the ammonium being removed in the first 3 mL of the 10-mL rinse volume. Application of the sampler at a dairy in the Joaquin Valley revealed large variations in concentrations at different locations along the downwind fenceline, which correlated with animal populations and activities directly upwind. In addition, large variations in ammonia concentrations were observed in relation to time of day and animal activity. Field blank loadings were of 1.40 microg NH4-N/filter (SD = 0.74 microg NH4-N/filter). Replicate passive samplers placed side-by-side during sampling episodes agreed with a slope of 1.010 (standard error = 0.028). Impingers were used as a reference method to obtain the correlation between filter loadings and air concentrations, yielding an "effective sampling rate" for the passive samplers of 6.18 L/h (error = 0.23 L/h). Using a theoretical calculation, that "effective flow rate" was calculated to be 6.29 L/h. The method's limit of detection was found to be 82.5 microg NH4-N/m3. Wind speed was found to theoretically affect linearity of sampler response only for speeds less than 0.92 m/s.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.