This study aimed to analyze the content of data availability statements (DAS) and the actual sharing of raw data in preprint articles about COVID-19. The study combined a bibliometric analysis and a cross-sectional survey. We analyzed preprint articles on COVID-19 published on medRxiv and bioRxiv from January 1, 2020 to March 30, 2020. We extracted data sharing statements, tried to locate raw data when authors indicated they were available, and surveyed authors. The authors were surveyed in 2020–2021. We surveyed authors whose articles did not include DAS, who indicated that data are available on request, or their manuscript reported that raw data are available in the manuscript, but raw data were not found. Raw data collected in this study are published on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/6ztec/). We analyzed 897 preprint articles. There were 699 (78%) articles with Data/Code field present on the website of a preprint server. In 234 (26%) preprints, data/code sharing statement was reported within the manuscript. For 283 preprints that reported that data were accessible, we found raw data/code for 133 (47%) of those 283 preprints (15% of all analyzed preprint articles). Most commonly, authors indicated that data were available on GitHub or another clearly specified web location, on (reasonable) request, in the manuscript or its supplementary files. In conclusion, preprint servers should require authors to provide data sharing statements that will be included both on the website and in the manuscript. Education of researchers about the meaning of data sharing is needed. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11192-022-04346-1.
Ovaj rad nastoji prikazati dva načina produljenja ljudskoga života. S jedne strane nalazi se distanazija, tj. terapijska upornost oko produženja života teškoga bolesnika, a s druge strane transhumanizam kao filozofski pravac koji u svojoj srži teži bezgraničnom produžavanju ljudskoga života s temeljnom željom za eliminiranjem bolesti, starenja i smrti. Povezujući ih s medicinskom praksom, rad pokazuje implikacije u kliničkoj praksi te nastoji upozoriti na etička i antropološka pitanja o produžavanju života.
Ekološka kriza kojom je pogođen svijet doživjela je dodatno pogoršanje zbog zdravstvene krize uzrokovane COVID-om19. U toj dvostrukoj krizi teško je odvojiti jednu krizu od druge. Svijest o povezanosti naizgled različitih kriza, ali i svih bića na Zemlji još je u 19. stoljeću iznjedrila pokušaje zajedničkih odgovora različitih znanstvenih disciplina. Ti pokušaji su kasnije dobili svoje pravo ime pod nazivom ‘One Health’ – jedno zdravlje. Riječ je o paradigmi koja nastoji raskrinkavati interakciju između čovjeka, životinja i biljaka te utjecaj jednih na druge. Ovaj članak pruža uvid u ključne karakteristike te paradigme, a pomoću biblijske teologije stvaranja i enciklike pape Franje ‘Laudato sì’, proširuje njezine vizije na područje teološko-bioetičkog promišljanja sa svrhom što cjelovitijeg interdisciplinarnog pristupa pitanju zajedničkog zdravlja u zajedničkom domu.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.