To assess the value of biochar to direct supply of crop nutrients we considered the release of phosphorus, magnesium and potassium from a hardwood biochar in a sequential leaching experiment with deionized water. Cumulative P release was proportionally large despite being quantitatively small, and the sixth extraction yielded 44-73% of the first, indicating that provision of soil P might be sustained for several seasons. Conversely, K release was quantitatively large but declined rapidly from first extraction to the last (6-18% of the first extraction). Only 6-27% of total Mg was recovered. These results indicate that these elements have contrasting associations with biochar that govern the trajectory and ultimate extent of their release. Fitting cumulative loss curves enabled these patterns to be quantitatively captured and compared and could provide a means to develop predictive capacity for the supply of nutrients from biochar to soil and plant.
Through meta-analysis, we synthesize results from field studies on the effect of biochar application on NO emissions and crop yield. We aimed to better constrain the effect of biochar on NO emissions under field conditions, identify significant predictor variables, assess potential synergies and tradeoffs between NO mitigation and yield, and discuss knowledge gaps. The response ratios for yield and NO emissions were weighted by one of two functions: (i) the inverse of the pooled variance or (ii) the inverse of number of observations per field site. Significant emission reductions were observed when weighting by the inverse of the pooled variance (-18.1 to -7.1%) but not when weighting by the number of observations per site (-17.1 to +0.8%), thus revealing a bias in the existing data by sites with more observations. Mean yield increased by 1.7 to 13.8%. Our study shows yield benefits but no robust evidence for NO emission reductions by biochar under field conditions. When weighted by the inverse of the number of observations per site, NO emission reductions were not significantly affected by cropping system, biochar properties of feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, surface area, pH, ash content, application rate, or site characteristics of N rate, N form, or soil pH. Uneven coverage in the range of these predictor variables likely underlies the failure to detect effects. We discuss the need for future biochar field studies to investigate effects of fertilizer N form, sustained and biologically relevant changes in soil moisture, multiple biochars per site, and time since biochar application.
Manure generated by intensive livestock operations poses potential ecological risk in the form of water pollution and greenhouse gas emission. To assess the impact of biochar on coarse-textured soils under contrasting nutrient management regimes, a 55-d incubation was conducted using unplanted soil columns amended with manure, slurry, or fertilizer (plus unamended control), each with or without biochar applied at 2% soil mass (dry weight basis). Under repeated leaching, the cumulative NO emission from the columns was significantly affected by the presence of biochar ( < 0.0001), although these data were not normally distributed. Results indicated that the biochar-amended soils emitted significantly less NO than their unamended counterparts, with the exception of manure-amended soils. The presence of biochar increased the pH of column leachate by 0.08 to 1.70 and significantly decreased the cumulative amount of mineral N leached from the soil. The presence of biochar significantly increased the amount of PO-P in soil leachate, but there was no significant difference between the means for any of the amendments used on their own relative to their biochar-amended counterparts. The data demonstrate that biochar could potentially aid in the mitigation of NO emissions from certain soils and in N loss in leachate from soil amended with slurry, manure, or fertilizer used in livestock systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.