2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of pine chip biochar on trace greenhouse gas emissions and soil nutrient dynamics in an annual ryegrass system in California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
28
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
7
28
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, as a pyrolysed product, biochar is protected from rapid microbial degradation and is able to securely sequester carbon, contributing to mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions (Lehmann et al, 2006). The result of the present study collaborate the recent findings of Angst et al (2014) who reported that SOC was significantly increased due to the applications of different biochars. Haefele et al (2011) reported a 66.5% increase in organic carbon contents at elevated level of 41.3 t ha -1 (about 4%) using rice husk biochar in a near neutral soil.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Notably, as a pyrolysed product, biochar is protected from rapid microbial degradation and is able to securely sequester carbon, contributing to mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions (Lehmann et al, 2006). The result of the present study collaborate the recent findings of Angst et al (2014) who reported that SOC was significantly increased due to the applications of different biochars. Haefele et al (2011) reported a 66.5% increase in organic carbon contents at elevated level of 41.3 t ha -1 (about 4%) using rice husk biochar in a near neutral soil.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In line with our results other field studies have shown significant reductions in N 2 O emissions following biochar amendment (Taghizadeh-Toosi et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2012). A number of studies found no significant effect of biochar addition in the field (Schimmelpfennig et al, 2014;Angst et al, 2014;Scheer et al, 2011;Karhu et al, 2011;Anderson et al, 2014). Often the much higher variability in the field and the low number of replications make it difficult to reproduce reduction effects observed in laboratory studies.…”
Section: N 2 O Emissionssupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Often the much higher variability in the field and the low number of replications make it difficult to reproduce reduction effects observed in laboratory studies. In particular, Angst et al (2014) found no significant difference but there was a tendency for lower emissions with biochar addition, suggesting that the variability in the field was too high to get significant effects. However there are also studies that showed increased emissions from biochar application in the field (Verhoeven and Six, 2014;Shen et al, 2014).…”
Section: N 2 O Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…N 2 O forms in soils as a result of microbiological nitrification and denitrification. The BC application contributed to change of soil conditions making them more favorable for nitrifiers due to enhancing aeration and increasing pH of soils as well as adsorption of nitrification inhibitors [1,14,[22][23][24]. However, the adsorption of NH 4 + on the BC surface or in its pores can result in the reduction of NH 4 + availability for nitrifiers [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%