The CBM technique exhibited slightly lesser uniformity in the center plane than the SS technique. Additionally, in the phantom study, the CV and %Diff of SUV values in CBM images tended to be slightly higher than those of SS images. However, since these differences were subtle, they might be negligible in clinical settings.

Background 18F-FDG PET is often utilized to determine BNCT selection due to the limited availability of 18F-BPA PET, which is performed by synthesizing 18F into the boron drug used for BNCT, although the uptake mechanisms between those are different. Additionally, only a few non-spatial point parameters, such as maximum SUV (SUVmax), have reported a correlation between those in previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the spatial accumulation pattern between those PET images in tumors, which would be expected to either show higher uptake on 18F-BPA PET or be utilized in clinical, to verify whether 18F-FDG PET could be used as a selection indicator for BNCT. Methods A total of 27 patients with 30 lesions (11 squamous cell carcinoma, 9 melanoma, and 10 rhabdomyosarcoma) who received 18F-FDG and 18F-BPA PET within 2 weeks were enrolled in this study. The ratio of metabolic tumor volumes (MTVs) to GTV, histogram indices (skewness/kurtosis), and the correlation of total lesion activity (TLA) and non-spatial point parameters (SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmin, maximum tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (Tmax/N), and Tmin/N) were evaluated. After local rigid registration between those images, distances of locations at SUVmax and the center of mass with MTVs on each image and similarity indices were also assessed along its coordinate. Results In addition to SUVmax, SUVpeak, and Tmax/N, significant correlations were found in TLA. The mean distance in SUVmax was $$25.2 \pm 24.4\; {\text{mm}}$$ 25.2 ± 24.4 mm and significantly longer than that in the center of mass with MTVs. The ratio of MTVs to GTV, skewness, and kurtosis were not significantly different. However, the similarities of MTVs were considerably low. The similarity indices of Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard coefficient, and mean distance to agreement for MTV40 were $$0.65 \pm 0.21$$ 0.65 ± 0.21 , $$0.51 \pm 0.21$$ 0.51 ± 0.21 , and $$0.27 \pm 0.30$$ 0.27 ± 0.30  cm, respectively. Furthermore, it was worse in MTV50. In addition, spatial accumulation patterns varied in cancer types. Conclusions Spatial accumulation patterns in tumors showed low similarity between 18F-FDG and 18F-BPA PET, although the various non-spatial point parameters were correlated. In addition, the spatial accumulation patterns were considerably different in cancer types. Therefore, the selection for BNCT using 18F-FDG PET should be compared carefully with using 18F-FBPA PET.

Purpose This study aimed to investigate risk factors for radiation pneumonitis (RP) caused by electron beam (EB) boost irradiation during breast-conserving therapy. Methods and Materials This single-institution retrospective study included patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy from 2013 to 2019. Radiation therapy comprised whole-breast irradiation with a dose of 50 Gy and 10 Gy EB boost dose to the tumor bed. EB energies were 4, 6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV. The lung volume receiving ≥1.25 Gy (V1.25) was calculated and considered because the EB energies have a short range. All patients underwent computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography within 1 year of irradiation. Imaging evaluation was based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Results Overall, 105 patients (median age, 62 years; range, 33-85) were included for analysis with a median follow-up period of 5 months. Average area of EB boost irradiation was 72 cm 2 (range, 36-196). Grade 1 RP developed in the EB irradiation field in 22 (20.6%) patients; grade 2 RP developed in 1 (0.93%) patient. Even in patients with central lung distance (CLD) ≥1.8 cm, a positive correlation was found between RP and both energy (r = 0.36; P = .005) and V1.25 (r = 0.26; P = .04). No correlation was found between RP and irradiation field size ( P = .47). The EB energy and V1.25 cutoff values were 12 MeV and 24 cm 3 , respectively. Conclusions CLD of ≥1.8 cm, EB energy of ≥12 MeV, and V1.25 of ≥24 cm 3 were risk factors associated with RP. Although the frequency of severe RP was not high, patients receiving high-energy electron treatment and those with a large CLD should be closely monitored.

No abstract

This study aimed to quantify the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for epithermal neutron beam contaminated with fast neutrons in the accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) system coupled to a solid-state lithium target. The experiments were performed in National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH), Tokyo, Japan. Neutron irradiation with the system provided by Cancer Intelligence Care Systems (CICS), Inc. was performed. X-ray irradiation, which was assigned as the reference group, was also performed using a medical linear accelerator (LINAC) equipped in NCCH. The four cell lines (SAS, SCCVII, U87-MG and NB1RGB) were utilized to quantify RBE value for the neutron beam. Before both of those irradiations, all cells were collected and dispensed into vials. The doses of 10% cell surviving fraction (SF) (D10) were calculated by LQ model fitting. All cell experiments were conducted in triplicate at least. Because the system provides not only neutrons, but gamma-rays, the contribution from the gamma-rays to the survival fraction were subtracted in this study. D10 value of SAS, SCCVII, U87-MG and NB1RGB for the neutron beam was 4.26, 4.08, 5.81 and 2.72 Gy, respectively, while that acquired by the X-ray irradiation was 6.34, 7.21, 7.12 and 5.49 Gy, respectively. Comparison of both of the D10 values, RBE value of SAS, SCCVII, U87-MG and NB1RGB for the neutron beam was calculated as 1.7, 2.2, 1.3 and 2.5, respectively, and the average RBE value was 1.9. This study investigated RBE of the epithermal neutron beam contaminated with fast neutrons in the accelerator-based BNCT system coupled to a solid-state lithium target.