No abstract

Results: A total of 145 ER, 7875 SR, and 70 HR procedures for G-GIST management was identified. According to different approaches, there was no difference in primary payer types or median household income. There was slight male to female predominance in ER and HR but not in the SR group. Racial disparities were noted in the ER .SR but not in HR (Figure). Most procedures were performed in teaching institutions: ER (93%), SR (86%), and HR (86%). Mortality for SR was 0.8%, and no inpatient deaths were recorded for ER or HR. Mean charges were highest for HR ($163,794) and lowest for ER ($86,811), with LOS highest for HR (10.7d), followed by ER (;7d) and SR (5.5d). More complications were noted in HR (43%, vs 28% in ER and 18% in SR) (Table ). Most SR and HR patients were discharged home (94% and 93%, respectively); A lesser percentage of ER (72%) were discharged home with a relatively higher percentage of 28% sent to long-term care facilities compared to SR (5%) and HR (7%). Conclusion: Minimally invasive management of G-GIST is evolving, with surgery still being most common. Both endoscopic and hybrid techniques are promising alternatives to surgery and show a lower mortality rate, however, with a higher percentage of non-fatal complications (both), increased cost (HR only), and increased LOS (both) compared to SR. Larger studies can help guide providers in choosing the optimal individual approach in G-GIST management.