Posterior shoulder fracture-dislocation is a rare injury accounting for approximately 0.9 % of shoulder fracture-dislocations. Impression fractures of the articular surface of the humeral head, followed by humeral neck fractures and fractures of the lesser and grater tuberosity, are the more common associated fractures. Multiple mechanisms have been implicated in the etiology of this traumatic entity most commonly resulting from forced muscle contraction as in epileptic seizures, electric shock or electroconvulsive therapy, major trauma such as motor vehicle accidents or other injuries involving axial loading of the arm, in an adducted, flexed and internally rotated position. Despite its' scarce appearance in daily clinical practice, posterior shoulder dislocation is of significant diagnostic and therapeutic interest because of its predilection for age groups of high functional demands (35-55 years old), in addition to high incidence of missed initial diagnosis ranging up to 79 % in some studies. Several treatment options have also been proposed to address this type of injury, ranging from non-surgical methods to humeral head reconstruction procedures or arthroplasty with no clear consensus over definitive treatment guidelines, reflecting the complexity of this injury in addition to the limited evidence provided by the literature. To enhance the literature, this article aims to present the current concepts for the diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of the patients with posterior fracture-dislocation shoulder, and to present a treatment algorithm based on the literature review and our own experience.

The lifetime risk for diabetic patients to develop a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is 25%. In these patients, the risk of amputation is increased and the outcome deteriorates.More than 50% of non-traumatic lower-extremity amputations are related to DFU infections and 85% of all lower-extremity amputations in patients with diabetes are preceded by an ulcer; up to 70% of diabetic patients with a DFU-related amputation die within five years of their amputation.Optimal management of patients with DFUs must include clinical awareness, adequate blood glucose control, periodic foot inspection, custom therapeutic footwear, off-loading in high-risk patients, local wound care, diagnosis and control of osteomyelitis and ischaemia.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:513-525. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180010

Graft infection following aortic aneurysms repair is an uncommon but devastating complication; its incidence ranges from <1% to 6% (mean 4%), with an associated perioperative and overall mortality of 12% and 17.5-20%, respectively. The most common causative organisms are Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli; causative bacteria typically arise from the skin or gastrointestinal tract. The pathogenetic mechanisms of aortic graft infections are mainly breaks in sterile technique during its implantation, superinfection during bacteremia from a variety of sources, severe intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal inflammation, inoculation of bacteria during postoperative percutaneous interventions to manage various types of endoleaks, and external injury of the vascular graft. Mechanical forces in direct relation to the device were implicated in fistula formation in 35% of cases of graft infection. Partial rupture and graft migration leading to gradual erosion of the bowel wall and aortoenteric fistulas have been reported in 30.8% of cases.Rarely, infection via continuous tissues may affect the spine, resulting in spondylitis. Even though graft explantation and surgical debridement is usually the preferred course of action, comorbidities and increased perioperative risk may preclude patients from surgery and endorse a conservative approach as the treatment of choice. In contrast, conservative treatment is the treatment of choice for spondylitis; surgery may be indicated in approximately 8.5% of patients with neural compression or excessive spinal infection. To enhance the literature, we searched the related literature for published studies on continuous spondylitis from infected endovascular grafts aiming to summarize the pathogenesis and diagnosis, and to discuss the treatment and outcome of the patients with these rare and complex infections.

Four-corner fusion is a reliable limited wrist fusion technique that provides pain relief, grip strength and satisfactory range of motion in patients with degenerative conditions of the wrist. Partial union is more common with Kirschner wire fixation and complications are more common with circular plate fixation.

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the soft tissue (GCT-ST) is a rare, unusual primary soft tissue tumor that is completely distinct from, and should not be confused with, any giant cell–rich tumor of bone or soft tissue. Currently, GCT-ST is included in the group of so-called fibrohistiocytic tumors of intermediate (borderline) malignancy. The most common symptom is a painless, slow-growing mass in a superficial location. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging show a solid, nonhomogeneous, frequently hemorrhagic mass. Differential diagnosis is broad and should include benign and malignant entities. The treatment and excision margins of GCT-ST are controversial. Incomplete surgical excision is usually followed by local recurrence. Biological behavior is unpredictable. Giant cell tumor of the soft tissue has shown a lower mean local recurrence rate compared to GCT of bone but has a higher metastatic and death rate. Therefore, close clinical follow-up is recommended. [ Orthopedics . 2019; 42(4):e364–e369.]