This is an overview of some of the important, challenging, and problematic issues in contemporary electron transfer research. After a qualitative discussion of electron transfer, its time and distance scales, energy curves, and basic parabolic energy models are introduced to define the electron transfer process. Application of transition state theory leads to the standard Marcus formulation of electron transfer rate constants. Electron transfer in solution is coupled to solvent polarization effects, and relaxation processes can contribute to and even control electron transfer. The inverted region, in which electron transfer rate constants decrease with increasing exoergicity, is one of the most striking phenomena in electron transfer chemistry. It is predicted by both semiclassical and quantum mechanical models, with the latter appropriate if there are coupled high- or medium-frequency vibrations. The intramolecular reorganizational energy has different contributions from different vibrational modes, which, in favorable cases, can be measured on a mode-by-mode basis by resonance Raman spectroscopy. Alternatively, mode-averaging procedures are available for including multimode contributions based on absorption or emission spectra. Rate constants for intramolecular electron transfer depend on electronic coupling and orbital overlap and, therefore, on distance. Mixed-valence systems have provided an important experimental platform for investigating solvent and structural effects and the transition between localized and delocalized behavior. One of the important developments in electron transfer is the use of absorption and emission measurements to calculate electron transfer rate constants. Ultrafast electron transfer measurements have been used to uncover nonequilibrium relaxation effects, an area that presents special challenges to the understanding of the dynamics and relaxation of the coupled processes. Electron transfer in the gas phase offers substantial insights into the nature of the electron transfer process. Similarly, electron transport in conductive polymers and synthetic metals depends on the basic principles of electron transfer, with some special nuances of their own.

An initial review (PCET1) on proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) by Huynh and Meyer appeared in Chemical Reviews in 2007. 1 This is a perennial review, a follow up on the original. It was intended for the special Chemical Reviews edition on Proton Coupled Electron Transfer that appeared in December, 2010 (Volume 110, Issue 12 Pages 6937-710). The reader is referred to it with articles on electrochemical approaches to studying PCET by Costentin and coworkers, 2 theory of electron proton transfer reactions by Hammes-Schiffer and coworkers, 3 proton-coupled electron flow in proteins and enzymes by Gray and coworkers, 4 and the thermochemistry of proton-coupled electron transfer by Mayer and coworkers. 5 Coverage for the current review is intended to be broad, covering all aspects of the topic comprehensively with literature coverage overlapping with the later references in PCET1 until late 2010. There is a growing understanding of the importance of PCET in chemistry and biology and its implications for catalysis and energy conversion. This has led to a series of informative reviews that have appeared since 2007. They include: "The possible role of Proton-coupled electron Transfer (PCET) in Water oxidation by Photosystem II" by Meyer and coworkers in 2007, 6 "Theoretical studies of proton-coupled electron transfer: Models and concepts relevant to bioenergetics" by Hammes-Schiffer and coworkers in 2008, 7 "Electrochemical Approach to the Mechanistic Study of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer" by Costentin in 2008, 8 "Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in Biology: Results from Synergistic Studies in Natural and Model Systems" by Nocera and Reece in 2009, 9 and "Integrating Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer and Excited States" by Meyer and coworkers in 2010. 10

An initial review (PCET1) on proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) by Huynh and Meyer appeared in Chemical Reviews in 2007. 1 This is a perennial review, a follow up on the original. It was intended for the special Chemical Reviews edition on Proton Coupled Electron Transfer that appeared in December, 2010 (Volume 110, Issue 12 Pages 6937-710). The reader is referred to it with articles on electrochemical approaches to studying PCET by Costentin and coworkers, 2 theory of electron proton transfer reactions by Hammes-Schiffer and coworkers, 3 proton-coupled electron flow in proteins and enzymes by Gray and coworkers, 4 and the thermochemistry of proton-coupled electron transfer by Mayer and coworkers. 5 Coverage for the current review is intended to be broad, covering all aspects of the topic comprehensively with literature coverage overlapping with the later references in PCET1 until late 2010. There is a growing understanding of the importance of PCET in chemistry and biology and its implications for catalysis and energy conversion. This has led to a series of informative reviews that have appeared since 2007. They include: "The possible role of Proton-coupled electron Transfer (PCET) in Water oxidation by Photosystem II" by Meyer and coworkers in 2007, 6 "Theoretical studies of proton-coupled electron transfer: Models and concepts relevant to bioenergetics" by Hammes-Schiffer and coworkers in 2008, 7 "Electrochemical Approach to the Mechanistic Study of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer" by Costentin in 2008, 8 "Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in Biology: Results from Synergistic Studies in Natural and Model Systems" by Nocera and Reece in 2009, 9 and "Integrating Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer and Excited States" by Meyer and coworkers in 2010. 10

No abstract