No abstract

Many therapeutic approaches to cancer affect the tumour vasculature, either indirectly or as a direct target. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has become an important means of investigating this action, both pre-clinically and in early stage clinical trials. For such trials, it is essential that the measurement process (i.e. image acquisition and analysis) can be performed effectively and with consistency among contributing centres. As the technique continues to develop in order to provide potential improvements in sensitivity and physiological relevance, there is considerable scope for between-centre variation in techniques. A workshop was convened by the Imaging Committee of the Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC) to review the current status of DCE-MRI and to provide recommendations on how the technique can best be used for early stage trials. This review and the consequent recommendations are summarised here. Key Points • Tumour vascular function is key to tumour development and treatment • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) can assess tumour vascular function • Thus DCE-MRI with pharmacokinetic models can assess novel treatments • Many recent developments are advancing the accuracy of and information from DCE-MRI • Establishing common methodology across multiple centres is challenging and requires accepted guidelines.

TTC is associated with slowly resolving global myocardial oedema, the acute extent of which correlates with regional contractile disturbance and acute release of both catecholamines and NT-proBNP.

The use of curve-fitting and compartmental modelling for calculating physiological parameters from measured data has increased in popularity in recent years. Finding the 'best fit' of a model to data involves the minimization of a merit function. An example of a merit function is the sum of the squares of the differences between the data points and the model estimated points. This is facilitated by curve-fitting algorithms. Two curve-fitting methods, Levenberg-Marquardt and MINPACK-1, are investigated with respect to the search start points that they require and the accuracy of the returned fits. We have simulated one million dynamic contrast enhanced MRI curves using a range of parameters and investigated the use of single and multiple search starting points. We found that both algorithms, when used with a single starting point, return unreliable fits. When multiple start points are used, we found that both algorithms returned reliable parameters. However the MINPACK-1 method generally outperformed the Levenberg-Marquardt method. We conclude that the use of a single starting point when fitting compartmental modelling data such as this produces unsafe results and we recommend the use of multiple start points in order to find the global minima.