Sources of particles in a ciosedcoupled electron cyclotron resonance plasma source used for polysiiicon etch included flaking of a residual film deposited on chamber surfaces and shedding of material from the electrostatic wafer chuck. A large. episodic increase in the number of particles added to a wafer in a clean system is ObSeNed more frequently for a plasma-on than for a gas-only source condition. For film-forming process conditions, particles were added to wafers by a residual film, which was observed to fracture and flake away from chamber surfaces. The presence of a plasma, especially when radiofrequency bias is applied to the wafer, caused more particles to be ejected from the walls and added to wafers than the microwave powers. A study of the effect of electrode temperatures on particles added showed that thermophoretic and gravitational forces are not significant for this electron cyclotron resonance operating configuration. Particles originating from the electrostatic chuck were observed to be deposited on wafers in much larger numbers in the presence of the plasma as compared with gas-only conditions, implying the existence of a large ion drag force.
Designed experiments were employed to characterize a process for etching phosphorus doped polycrystalline silicon with HBr in a close-coupled electron cyclotron resonance plasma reactor configured for 200 mm wafers. A fractional factorial screening experiment was employed to determine the principal input factors and the main etch effects. Linear models of the process responses indicate rf power, O2 flow rate, and the position of the resonance zone (with respect to the wafer) as the three strongest factors influencing process performance. Response surfaces generated using data from a follow-on response surface methodology experiment predicted an optimum operating region characterized by relatively low rf power, a small O2 flow, and a resonance zone position close to the wafer. One operating point in this region demonstrated a polysilicon etch rate of 270 nm/min, an etch rate nonuniformity of 2.2% (1 std. dev.), an etch selectivity to oxide greater than 100:1, and anisotropic profiles. Particle test results for the optimized process indicated that careful selection of the O2 fraction is required to avoid residue deposition and particle formation.
Traditionally, structural dynamic simulation predictions for hollow structures do not include internal acoustic volumes. This is the case for two reasons. First, it can be difficult to create a volume mesh of complicated internal cavities, and this additional volume would drastically increase the size of the model. Second, it is often blindly assumed that acoustic coupling is not important for structures with anything but thin walls. However, if the structural and acoustic modes are compatible, that is, the modes have similar frequencies and shapes, then the interaction between the structure and the enclosed acoustic volume will occur and can have an effect on structural response. The magnitude of this coupling effect is demonstrated here by examining the structural response predictions for a finite element model of a hollow structure with and without the acoustic volume in place. When a base excitation is applied at a frequency and location to excite compatible modes, the response predictions are seen to be drastically different if the acoustic volume is included. The frequency response results of the coupled finite element simulations will be compared with those of the classic two degree of freedom dynamic vibration absorber, showing the effect of frequency ratio and damping on the structural response.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.