HAR achieves equivalent short-term results to standard open arch repair, with a decreased need for CPB. However, considering the inferior mid-term outcomes of this procedure, its indications should be limited to high-risk patients.

The rates of mortality and morbidity remain high in surgery for acute type A dissection. There is controversy regarding the best cannulation strategy for achieving good clinical results. Each cannulation technique has different anatomical characteristics and a different flow pattern inside the aorta during cardiopulmonary bypass. Some adverse, clinically important outcomes may be related to events at this time. Femoral artery cannulation, axillary artery cannulation, and central aortic cannulation are the three major cannulation strategies that are adopted in many centers in the world. Accumulating results from comparative studies between right axillary artery cannulation and femoral artery cannulation show that right axillary artery cannulation is associated with better clinical outcomes. However, all of the studies have been retrospective, and few studies have compared the results of other combinations of cannulation strategies. Observational studies using newer monitoring techniques clearly show that no perfusion strategy is perfect or free from complications. In summary, the evidence is insufficient to make a strong recommendation regarding cannulation strategies. Based on the fairly consistent results of retrospective studies, more surgeons are tending to switch from a retrograde perfusion strategy to adopt an antegrade perfusion strategy. Regardless of the routine cannulation strategy that is adopted, careful monitoring and a swift response to adverse events are necessary. The further accumulation of evidence is warranted.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the background trends and surgical outcomes for more than 10 000 patients with acute type A dissection in Japan in a recent 8-year period. METHODS Data on replacement of the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch for acute type A dissection were collected from the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database from 2008 to 2015. Linear-by-linear association tests or Cuzick’s test for trend was used to evaluate group trends over time. The results were calculated for ascending or hemiarch replacement and arch replacement. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to calculate the risk-adjusted operative mortality rate. RESULTS A total of 11 843 patients were included. The overall 30-day mortality and operative mortality rates were 7.6% and 9.5%, respectively. The number of surgically treated cases increased from 2436 patients in 2008–2009 to 3533 in 2014–2015, a 45.0% increase. A trend analysis revealed significant changes in patient characteristics with time, including increasing age and rate of preoperative renal failure. Despite worsening risk factors, the unadjusted operative mortality rate with arch replacement showed a significant downward trend (P = 0.01; test of trend). The risk-adjusted mortality rate showed a downward trend both in ascending aorta or hemiarch replacement and arch replacement, although the trend was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Unadjusted and adjusted operative deaths have shown a decreasing trend, although patients undergoing surgery for acute type A dissection have demonstrated worsening of risk factors, such as age and renal failure. The number of surgeries performed for acute type A dissection significantly increased throughout the study period in Japan.

A combination of left anterior thoracotomy and upper median sternotomy can be applied to the single-stage repair of extended aneurysms with acceptable results in appropriately selected patients.

No abstract