Estimates of f and D derived from the widely used least squares IVIM fitting showed poor measurement reproducibility. Efforts should be made to improve the measurement reproducibility of perfusion-sensitive IVIM parameters.
The purpose was to determine the reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in a two-centre phase I clinical trial; and to track ADC changes in response to the sequential administration of the vascular disrupting agent, combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P), and the anti-angiogenic drug, bevacizumab. Sixteen patients with solid tumours received CA4P and bevacizumab treatment. Echo-planar diffusion-weighted MRI was performed using six b values (b = 0-750 s/mm(2)) before (x2), and at 3 and 72 h after a first dose of CA4P. Bevacizumab was given 4 h after a second dose of CA4P, and imaging performed 3 h post CA4P and 72 h after bevacizumab treatment. The coefficient of repeatability (r) of ADC total (all b values), ADC high (b = 100-750) and ADC low (b = 0-100) was calculated by Bland-Altman analysis. The ADC total and ADC high showed good measurement reproducibility (r% = 13.3, 14.1). There was poor reproducibility of the perfusion-sensitive ADC low (r% = 62.5). Significant increases in the median ADC total and ADC high occurred at 3 h after the second dose of CA4P (p < 0.05). ADC measurements were highly reproducible in a two-centre clinical trial setting and appear promising for evaluating the effects of drugs that target tumour vasculature.
Objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyldiethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) and a combination of both techniques for the detection of colorectal hepatic metastases. Methods: 72 patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI and DW-MRI. Images were retrospectively reviewed with unenhanced T 1 and T 2 weighted images as Gd-EOB-DTPA image set, DW-MRI image set and combined image set by two independent radiologists. Each lesion detected was scored for size, location and likelihood of metastasis, and compared with surgery and follow-up imaging. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using receiver operating characteristics and interobserver agreement by kappa statistics. In patients with colorectal cancer, accurate assessment of the size, location and segmental distribution of liver metastases on a per-lesion basis is critical for treatment planning [1]. Accurate depiction of the size and distribution of liver metastases helps the selection of patients to undergo radical surgery [2,3] or minimally invasive therapy, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) [4], chemoembolisation or radio-embolisation [5].The image contrast in diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) is based on differences in the mobility of water between tissues [6]. In tumour tissues, such as liver metastases, water mobility is often more impeded compared with normal parenchyma. Hence, metastases appear to have high signal intensity on DW-MRI, facilitating their detection.Compared with conventional T 2 weighted imaging, DW-MRI has been found to be superior for lesion detection in the liver [7][8][9]. When compared with contrastenhanced MRI, DW-MRI had a higher diagnostic accuracy compared with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MRI [10] and similar diagnostic accuracy compared with gadolinium contrast-enhanced imaging [11] for detecting colorectal liver metastases. DW-MRI has also been found to be more sensitive than fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) CT [12] for the same clinical indication. In another study, combining DW-MRI with T 1 weighted imaging after liver-specific contrast medium mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) administration improved the diagnostic accuracy of colorectal liver metastases detection compared with either technique alone [13].Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA; Eovist or Primovist; Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany) is a relatively new hepatocyteselective MR contrast medium that has been shown to be useful detecting liver metastases measuring ,1 cm in diameter [14,15]. Delayed T 1 weighted imaging in the hepatocellular phase of contrast enhancement at 20 min to several hours after contrast administration demonstrates metastases as T 1 hypointense lesions against the avidly enhancing liver parenchyma.Both DW-MRI and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI are useful for the detection of liver metastases [7,8,[14][15][16].One study performed at 3 T compared th...
ObjectivesTo examine repeatability of parameters derived from non-Gaussian diffusion models in data acquired in children with solid tumours.MethodsPaediatric patients (<16 years, n = 17) were scanned twice, 24 h apart, using DWI (6 b-values, 0–1000 mm−2 s) at 1.5 T in a prospective study. Tumour ROIs were drawn (3 slices) and all data fitted using IVIM, stretched exponential, and kurtosis models; percentage coefficients of variation (CV) calculated for each parameter at all ROI histogram centiles, including the medians.ResultsThe values for ADC, D, DDCα, α, and DDCK gave CV < 10 % down to the 5th centile, with sharp CV increases below 5th and above 95th centile. K, f, and D* showed increased CV (>30 %) over the histogram. ADC, D, DDCα, and DDCK were strongly correlated (ρ > 0.9), DDCα and α were not correlated (ρ = 0.083).ConclusionPerfusion- and kurtosis-related parameters displayed larger, more variable CV across the histogram, indicating observed clinical changes outside of D/DDC in these models should be interpreted with caution. Centiles below 5th for all parameters show high CV and are unreliable as diffusion metrics. The stretched exponential model behaved well for both DDCα and α, making it a strong candidate for modelling multiple-b-value diffusion imaging data.Key Points • ADC has good repeatability as low 5th centile of the histogram distribution. • High CV was observed for all parameters at extremes of histogram. • Parameters from the stretched exponential model showed low coefficients of variation. • The median ADC, D, DDC α , and DDC K are highly correlated and repeatable. • Perfusion/kurtosis parameters showed high CV variations across their histogram distributions.
ObjectivesTo evaluate sources of error in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) measurement of percent fibroglandular tissue (%FGT) using two-point Dixon sequences for fat-water separation.MethodsTen female volunteers (median age: 31 yrs, range: 23–50 yrs) gave informed consent following Research Ethics Committee approval. Each volunteer was scanned twice following repositioning to enable an estimation of measurement repeatability from high-resolution gradient-echo (GRE) proton-density (PD)-weighted Dixon sequences. Differences in measures of %FGT attributable to resolution, T1 weighting and sequence type were assessed by comparison of this Dixon sequence with low-resolution GRE PD-weighted Dixon data, and against gradient-echo (GRE) or spin-echo (SE) based T1-weighted Dixon datasets, respectively.Results%FGT measurement from high-resolution PD-weighted Dixon sequences had a coefficient of repeatability of ±4.3%. There was no significant difference in %FGT between high-resolution and low-resolution PD-weighted data. Values of %FGT from GRE and SE T1-weighted data were strongly correlated with that derived from PD-weighted data (r = 0.995 and 0.96, respectively). However, both sequences exhibited higher mean %FGT by 2.9% (p < 0.0001) and 12.6% (p < 0.0001), respectively, in comparison with PD-weighted data; the increase in %FGT from the SE T1-weighted sequence was significantly larger at lower breast densities.ConclusionAlthough measurement of %FGT at low resolution is feasible, T1 weighting and sequence type impact on the accuracy of Dixon-based %FGT measurements; Dixon MRI protocols for %FGT measurement should be carefully considered, particularly for longitudinal or multi-centre studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.