Objective: To systematically review and assess the effectiveness and safety of antidepressants for neuropathic pain among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: A systematic search was conducted using multiple databases for relevant articles published from 1980 to April 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving antidepressant treatment of neuropathic pain with ≥3 individuals and ≥50% of study population with SCI were included. Two independent reviewers selected studies based on inclusion criteria and then extracted data. Pooled analysis using Cohen's d to calculate standardized mean difference, standard error, and 95% confidence interval for primary (pain) and other secondary outcomes was conducted. Results: Four RCTs met inclusion criteria. Of these, 2 studies assessed amitriptyline, 1 trazadone, and 1 duloxetine among individuals with neuropathic SCI pain. A small effect was seen in the effectiveness of antidepressants in decreasing pain among individuals with SCI (standardized mean difference = 0.34 ± 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.62; P = .02). A number needed to treat of 3.4 for 30% or more pain relief was found by pooling 2 studies. Of these, significantly higher risk of experiencing constipation (risk ratio [RR] = 1.74; 95% CI, 1.09-2.78; P = .02) and dry mouth (RR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.04-1.85; P = .02) was found amongst individuals receiving antidepressant treatment compared to those in the control group. Conclusion: The current meta-analysis demonstrates that antidepressants are effective in reducing neuropathic SCI pain. However, this should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of studies. Further evaluation of long-term therapeutic options may be required.
Many international glaucoma CPGs are of high methodological quality. However, coverage of MIGS is sparse, nonspecific and in many instances, absent. This causes CPGs to be a suboptimal source in guiding physicians and health policy-makers in areas characterized by novel and/or rapidly evolving technologies. Mechanisms to incorporate updated evidence in CPGs would have to be considered before they can be used as a source of contemporary clinical decision-making.
Background: Choosing which patients to recommend surgery for benign thyroid conditions can be difficult due to the subjective nature of compressive thyroid and hormonal symptoms. The aim of this prospective study was to analyse changes in quality of life (QOL) following thyroid surgery using a validated disease-specific assessment tool, the thyroid-related patient-reported outcome (ThyPRO) questionnaire. Methods: Participants undergoing elective thyroid surgery for benign conditions were recruited. Patient demographics and clinical data were collected. ThyPRO consists of 85 questions grouped into 13 physical, mental and social symptom domains. Patients completed a ThyPRO questionnaire pre-operatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months post-operatively. Thy-PRO items were scored according to protocol to produce 13 subscales. Repeated measures linear models with no random effects were performed using data for each outcome. Results: Results were available for a total of 72 patients. The sample was predominately female (n = 63, 88%) with average age 49.8 years. The majority of patients underwent surgery for multi-nodular goitre. At 6 weeks post-operatively, significant improvement was demonstrated in the goitre, hypothyroid, hyperthyroid and anxiety symptom domains. At 6 months post-operatively, significant improvement was demonstrated in all but four domains. No domains demonstrated significant increase in impairment post-operatively. Conclusion: Patients had significant improvement in nine of 13 symptom domains following surgery. Patients did not experience a negative impact on QOL following surgery. Further studies with larger patient cohorts may be able to identify potential pre-operative predictive factors for a post-operative improvement in QOL for benign thyroid disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.