No abstract

Dietary energy restriction was previously shown to be effective in preventing a wide range of experimentally induced cancers. Studies were conducted to assess the influence on pancreatic carcinogenesis of dietary energy restrictions (reduced fat and carbohydrate) of 10%, 20% or 40% in comparison with control in Syrian hamsters treated with N-nitrosobis(2-oxopropyl)amine (BOP). Two carcinogenesis studies were conducted. One used a single treatment with 20 mg BOP/kg body weight and followed hamsters for 102 weeks following treatment, and the other used three weekly treatments of 20 mg BOP/kg body weight and followed hamsters for 45 weeks after treatment. Hamsters were fed control or energy restricted diet beginning the week following the last BOP treatment. Pancreatic carcinomas were induced in 9-18% of the hamsters in the first experiment and in 59-66% of the animals in the second. Dietary energy restriction did not influence carcinoma incidence in either study, and in the second experiment the multiplicity of tumors was higher in the 40% energy restriction (ER) group than in control hamsters. Plasma corticosterone was suppressed by BOP treatment, particularly in the 20% and 40% ER hamsters in the second experiment, and diet or BOP treatment did not significantly alter plasma cortisol. Pancreatic protein kinase Czeta measured by Western blot was highest in the cytosol and particulate fractions of the 40% ER hamsters in the first experiment. These results indicate that dietary energy restriction is not effective in the prevention of BOP induced pancreatic carcinogenesis in the Syrian hamster.

Female SENCAR mice were pre-fed a control or 40% energy-restricted (ER) diet with energy removed from fat and carbohydrate, or a control, balanced high fat (BHF, with similar energy from fat and carbohydrate), 35% energy restricted from fat (HCR) or 35% energy restricted from carbohydrate (HFR) diet. Epidermal cells were isolated by trypsin digestion for measurement of protein kinase C (PKC) activity, lipid composition or lipid metabolism. Dietary restriction of fat or carbohydrate energy (HFR or HCR group) reduced particulate PKC activity in epidermal cells compared with cells from control mice. The ratio of soluble particulate PKC activity was higher in epidermal cells from mice fed the HCR diet compared with those fed the HFR diet. Diet did not affect soluble PKC activity. Inositol accumulation was measured in the water- or lipid-soluble fractions of prelabeled ([3H]inositol) epidermal cells following a 1-h incubation in media with LiCl. Phosphatidylinositol, inositol biphosphate and inositol triphosphate fractions were more heavily labeled in cells from mice fed the ER diet. Energy restriction did not modify epidermal total lipid or phospholipid composition, but 1,2-diacylglycerol levels were elevated in relation to cell number in epidermal cells from mice fed the ER diet. These data suggest that dietary energy restriction modified PKC activity through a pathway other than alteration in membrane lipid composition or inositol lipid metabolism.

No abstract

Dietary restriction in experimental animals enhances life span, delays disease, inhibits immunological perturbations, and ameliorates cancer. Protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes mediate signals generated by hormones, growth factors, and neurotransmitters for cell proliferation and differentiation. The results of our study showed that a C-terminally directed anti-PKC zeta antibody detected an 81-kDa band in the pancreases of control and energy-restricted hamsters. Syrian golden hamsters were fed energy-restricted diets formulated such that the hamsters received 90% (10% energy restriction (ER)), 80% (20% ER), or 60% (40% ER) of the total energy consumed by control hamsters, with the energy reduced proportionally from fat and carbohydrate. ER decreased PKC zeta isozyme levels by 40-75% in hamsters fed 10, 20, and 40% ER diets for 8 wk. PKC zeta isozyme expression was decreased by 75-80% in hamsters fed ER diets for 15 wk. Although ER caused significant decreases in PKC zeta isozyme levels compared with those of control hamsters at both time points, the relative differences in PKC zeta levels between the dietary ER groups (10, 20, and 40%) were small and not significant. A significant decrease in the body weights of ER animals compared with those of controls was observed at both time points. No differences in tomato lectin and phytohemagglutinin reactivity were observed between control animals and animals fed 10, 20, and 40% ER diets. Furthermore, the cellular expression of PKC zeta in the hamster pancreas did not differ among hamsters fed the various ER diets. These observations may be important for understanding not only the role of dietary ER in pancreatic cancers but also PKC zeta signal transduction mechanisms in normal pancreatic physiology.