No abstract

The philosophy of education is always an essential issue of every education system. Over the past 70 years, depending on the stage of educational development, Vietnam's educational philosophy has existed and changed many times. So what is the educational philosophy in Vietnam nowadays? There are too many views on this. In this article, we present our views on this extremely important issue. The research results are based on the methodology of systematization, the methods of analysis – synthesis and comparison. We also use some conclusions of Vietnamese researchers as references. Indeed, Vietnam's educational philosophy can be divided into two periods: before 1945 and after 1945. Before 1945, Vietnam's educational philosophy was largely influenced by Confucianism, so ideal model was "quan tu" (true gentleman) people. After 1945, the country was independent, the philosophy of education was aimed at training the new socialist people. This change, on one side, meets the requirement to maintain social stability, but the other side is not paying attention to individual people and their creation. This leads to the crises of the whole education system, especially in the context of globalization and internationalization. The new context is setting new requirements for the educational philosophy of Vietnam. From a philosophical point of view, with reconsidering the human nature in general, we suppose that the new educational philosophy of Vietnam nowadays must be training freedom, creativity and bravery people, based on a human. In this article, we will raise different views of many scholars about it and present our points of views on this extremely important issue. In this article, we will denote different conceptions of many scholars about it and take our view on this extremely important issue. Hereafter indicating the educational achievements of Vietnam in the past, we introduce the system of perceptions about the human in Vietnamese society today and regarding this as the basis for building the philosophy of education and showing the basic ideas of the educational philosophy, which exists in Vietnam nowadays. Finally, we state our views on this issue. It is a combination of ideas that are difficult to say in a sentence.

According to our survey, most students are not interested and afraid of Logic. Every year, over 700,000 university and college students have to study this subject out of nearly 2 million students of 521 universities and colleges (Ministry of Education and Training 2020). The logic course consists of about 2-4 credits, depending on the program structure of each university. Thus, the impact of the study of Logic on the general knowledge of students is not tiny. So how to improve the quality of teaching and learning this subject? In this paper, we will present some answers to this question, using Constructivism in teaching.

No abstract

Introduction: Primary aorto-enteric fistula (PAEF) is a rare disease in which a direct communication between the aorta and gastrointestinal structure occurs and causes a gastrointestinal bleeding with high mortality - 100% if untreated in emergency. Method: Retrospective descriptive report of a rare clinical case of aorto-duodenal fistula which was successfully treated at Viet Duc University Hospital, and a review of the literature on this pathology. Result: Case report - a 40-year-old male patient was hospitalized with hemorrhagic shock, abdominal pain, continuous melaena, computed tomography without contrast showed images of abdominal aortic aneurysm 7cm of diameter just below the bifurcation of the renal artery, communicating with the gastrointestinal structure. Surgical treatment was oversewing above and below the aneurysm, extra-anatomical bypass with vascular prothesis; resection of D3, D4 duodenum, duodenum-jejunostomy, jejunostomy. He was discharged from hospital after 26 days, re-examinated 3 months after surgery. The literature in the world reports less than 500 cases of this disease, there are many causes with the most common anatomical locations being fistulas in the duodenum and esophagus. Conclusion: PAEF is a serious disease that requires early diagnosis and multi-specialty emergency management, computed tomography has a high value in definitive diagnosis. Treatment by abdominal aortic oversewing, extra-anatomical bypass and intestinal resection have quite high success rates.