No abstract

waste management is yet to be solved, in every area including Kudus. This research focuses on the obstacles dealt with in the process. The subject limitation area is Kudus. It is a research on doctrinal/normative law using statute approach. The data collected are library in nature, analyzed in a qualitative way. It shows that some laws are issued by the government in order to regulate waste management and the authority of local government. Included in these laws are Law no. 32 of 2009 on environmental protection and management. Law no. 18 of 2008 on Waste management, Law no. 24 of 2014 on Local government and regional regulation of Kudus on waste. Yet the awareness of the society seems to nullify the law and its implementation. There must be sanction for those breaking the law, in order to build Good Governance.

Amdal is an analysis of environmental impacts. The purpose of Amdal is to analyze aneffect that arises from a planned construction project or building. The Amdal documentis mandatory for any initiator or entrepreneur who will apply for an environmentalpermit. This obligation is because it aims to protect the environment from damagecaused by development. However, many entrepreneurs do not understand the existenceof an Amdal, so they mostly build first and then take care of it. Amdal. The researchmethod used in this research is juridical normative or doctrinal. The traditionalmaterials used are primary and secondary legal materials; primary standard materialsinclude statutory regulations and legal documents. Based on the regular analysis fromthe author, the Amdal document has a critical position to maintain the quality of theenvironment and the sustainability of public health. On the other hand, Amdal alsoguarantees sustainable development and environmentally sound development (ecodevelopment).

This study discusses the concept of sustainable development in relation to environmental law enforcement. The object of this research is to compare sustainable development in environmental enforcement between Indonesia and Finland and Japan. This research is doctrinal research or normative research using comparative law approach. the data used is secondary data. Based on the results of the research conducted. Several differences were found between the application of the concept of sustainable development between Indonesia and Japan and Finland, namely Indonesia in implementing the concept of sustainable development was not optimal, as evidenced by the birth of government policies that were not pro-environmental. different from Japan and Finland. The two countries have focused on reducing carbon emissions from industry, greenhouse gases and traffic. This explains that Japan and Finland are really serious about protecting the environment.

The Bengawan Solo river basin in Central Java Province, Indonesia, has a great history from era to era. But there are still issues with its current management system. Because of that, this paper aims to analyze issues in the management policies of the Bengawan Solo river basin. This is empirical legal research with qualitative analysis. The data were collected through interviews with informants who manage the Bengawan Solo river basin, from the Bengawan Solo River Management Office (RMO), the Environmental Service of Sukoharjo, Surakarta, and Karanganyar Regencies, as well as people who live around the Bengawan Solo river. Research showed that issues that concern the Bengawan Solo river basin are: (1) river basin pollution due to textile waste that is illegally disposed of in the river, and (2) there is a lack of regional regulations that are specially made to manage river basins. Based on the issues faced by the Bengawan Solo river basin, there needs to be a change in the policies on river basin management. There should be a special regulation on the Bengawan Solo river basin area. Apart from that, the Bengawan Solo river basin management should be changed into more effective management patterns.