OCT enables the detection of CAV-associated plaque compositions and allows early detection and differentiation of vessel wall disease not visible on angiography. LFP was the most prevalent plaque component, was strongly associated with NFCP, and may be associated with stepwise CAV progression caused by organizing mural thrombi. (The GRAFT Study: Evaluation of Graft Function, Rejection and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in First Heart Transplant Recipients; NCT02077764).

No abstract

Objectives: To compare on the bench the physical and mechanical properties of Magmaris, a magnesium bioresorbable scaffold (BRS), with Absorb and DESolve polymeric BRS and a permanent metallic stent. Background: Understanding the mechanical and physical properties of BRS is crucial for appropriate implantation and postdilatation. Methods: Testing was performed in fluid at 37 C and in silicone bifurcation phantoms with a 30 angle between main branch (MB) and side branch. Results: The 3.0-mm Magmaris BRS did not fracture after MB postdilatation up to 4.4 mm in contrast to the Absorb where the safe postdilatation diameter was 3.7 mm. For dilatation through stent cells, there were no Magmaris fractures with 3.0-mm noncompliant (NC) balloons inflated to nominal pressure. Mini-kissing balloon postdilatation with two 3.0-mm NC balloons up to 17 atm was without fracture except for an outlier. Longitudinal and radial strengths were similar for Magmaris and Absorb BRS. The crossing profile for the Magmaris was larger than other devices. Recoil 120 min after deployment was the greatest for Magmaris but 120 min after 3.5 mm postdilatation all devices had similar diameters. Conclusions: The Magmaris BRS was more resistant to strut fracture than Absorb. It had a larger crossing profile than other devices and similar radial and longitudinal strengths to Absorb. While recoil after deployment was greater with Magmaris, 120 min after 3.5 mm postdilatation all devices had similar diameters.

ObjectivesTo confirm clinically that coronary balloon catheter tips may be damaged during bifurcation treatment with side‐branch access through the side of a stent. On the bench, we aimed to assess the susceptibility of different balloon designs to damage. We compared catheter tip widths. We tested whether balloon tip flaring can cause stent distortion.BackgroundWe had observed that balloon catheters that failed to cross to a side‐branch frequently exhibited tip damage.Methods and ResultsWe examined microscopically for damage 82 balloon tips after clinical side‐branch access. In a bench study, the forces required to compress catheter tips 0.5 mm were compared to assess susceptibility to damage. We compared tip widths of balloons of different nominal inflation diameters. We examined stents after side‐branch access for distortion. In 42 of 48 (88%) of balloon tips from patients with resistance to or failure to cross through the side of a stent there was tip damage. Even when the balloon crossed without perceptible resistance, tip damage occurred in over half of balloons 18/34 (53%). Some balloon designs were more resistant to damage than others. Tips from balloons of different nominal diameters from the same manufacturer had the same width. Stent distortion caused by damaged balloon tips is improved by kissing balloon post‐dilatation.ConclusionsBalloon tip damage is common with crossing between stent struts. This is one cause of failure of a balloon to access a side‐branch and a new balloon should be used. If stent distortion is suspected, it should be corrected with kissing balloon post‐dilatation.

No abstract