This large prospective collection of blood samples was undertaken to determine inflammatory status during pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnancies. Our results support a tendency towards increased inflammation in pre-eclampsia, but the measured cytokines are not eligible for prediction, monitoring or diagnosing pre-eclampsia.
Sodium-glucose
cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition reduces cardiovascular morbidity and
mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Beneficial effects have been
attributed to increased ketogenesis, reduced cardiac fatty acid oxidation and
diminished cardiac oxygen consumption. We therefore studied whether SGLT2
inhibition altered cardiac oxidative substrate consumption, efficiency, and
perfusion.
<p>13 individuals with
type 2 diabetes were studied after four weeks treatment with empagliflozin and
placebo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Myocardial
palmitate and glucose uptake were measured with <sup>11</sup>C-palmitate and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG
PET/CT. Oxygen consumption and myocardial external efficiency (MEE) were
measured with <sup>11</sup>C-acetate PET/CT. Resting and adenosine stress myocardial
blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) were measured using <sup>15</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O
PET/CT. </p>
<p>Empagliflozin did not
affect myocardial FFA uptake but reduced myocardial glucose uptake by 57% (p<0.001).
Empagliflozin did not change myocardial oxygen consumption or MEE. Empagliflozin
reduced resting MBF by 13% (p<0.01), but did not significantly affect stress
MBF or MFR.</p>
<p>In conclusion, SGLT2
inhibition did not affect myocardial FFA uptake, but channeled myocardial
substrate utilization from glucose towards other sources and reduced resting
MBF. However, the observed metabolic and hemodynamic changes were modest and
most likely contribute only partially to the cardioprotective effect of SGLT2
inhibition. </p>
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the rapid-acting insulin analogues lispro and aspart were compared in a randomized, double-blind crossover study of 20 fasting healthy men following a single subcutaneous injection. Either insulin lispro or aspart, 0.05 U/kg-body-weight, was injected subcutaneously and followed by determination of 5-h profiles of plasma glucose, serum C-peptide and insulin concentrations. Lowest glucose concentrations were observed after 50 min in the aspart group (3.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/l versus lispro 3.5 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; p = 0.026) and after 60 min in the lispro group (3.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/l). For blood glucose t min was 59.3 +/- 3.4 min in the aspart and 63.5 +/- 5.3 min in the lispro group (ns). After 40 min a lower C-peptide was determined for aspart (225 +/- 21 pmol/l versus lispro 309 +/- 33 pmol/l; p = 0.031), whereas minimal C-peptide concentrations were reached in both groups after 105 min (lispro 117 +/- 21 pmol/l versus aspart 105 +/- 18 pmol/l). The maximal concentration of insulin was detected in both groups after 40 min (lispro 20.8 +/- 1.1 mU/l versus aspart 24.6 +/- 1.3 mU/l; p = 0.032). For insulin t max was 33.0 +/- 2.6 min in the aspart versus 33.3 +/- 2.6 min in the lispro group (ns). The present results indicate a more rapid absorption of insulin aspart in comparison to insulin lispro. Higher insulin concentrations after subcutaneus injection may be advantageous in meal-related treatment of diabetes.
Key summary points
Aim
Confusion was more prevalent in frail than in non-frail older patients at hospital admission.
Finding
COVID-19 and accelerated functional decline were associated among frail older hospitalised patients when compared to non-frail.
Message
Ninety-day all-cause mortality was 70% among frail hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and 15% among non-frail.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.