ObjectiveTo assess the value of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring system, for prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to detect prostate cancer, and classical parameters, such as prostatespecific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume and PSA density, for predicting biopsy outcome in biopsy na€ ıve patients who have suspected prostate cancer. Patients and methodsPatients who underwent mpMRI at our hospital, and who had their first prostate biopsy between July 2010 and April 2014, were analysed retrospectively. The prostate biopsies were taken transperineally under transrectal ultrasonography guidance. In all, 14 cores were biopsied as a systematic biopsy in all patients. Two cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy cores were added for each lesion in patients who had suspicious or equivocal lesions on mpMRI. The PI-RADS scoring system version 2.0 (PI-RADS v2) was used to describe the MRI findings. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine significant predictors of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer. ResultsIn all, 288 patients were analysed. The median patient age, PSA level, prostate volume and PSA density were 69 years, 7.5 ng/mL, 28.7 mL, and 0.26 ng/mL/mL, respectively. The biopsy results were benign, clinically insignificant, and clinically significant prostate cancer in 129 (45%), 18 (6%) and 141 (49%) patients, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that PI-RADS v2 score and PSA density were independent predictors for prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer. When PI-RADS v2 score and PSA density were combined, a PI-RADS v2 score of ≥4 and PSA density ≥0.15 ng/mL/mL, or PI-RADS v2 score of 3 and PSA density of ≥0.30 ng/mL/mL, was associated with the highest clinically significant prostate cancer detection rates (76-97%) on the first biopsy. Of the patients in this group with negative biopsy results, 22% were subsequently diagnosed as prostate cancer. In contrast, a PI-RADS v2 score of ≤3 and PSA density of <0.15 ng/mL/mL yielded no clinically significant prostate cancer and no additional detection of prostate cancer on further biopsies. ConclusionsA combination of PI-RADS v2 score and PSA density can help in the decision-making process before prostate biopsy and in the follow-up strategy in biopsy na€ ıve patients. Patients with a PI-RADS v2 score of ≤3 and PSA density of <0.15 ng/mL/mL may avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Background: Vanin-1 is a novel acute kidney injury (AKI) biomarker that has not been clinically investigated as a biomarker for obstructive nephropathy. This study investigated the diagnostic value of vanin-1 as a biomarker for adult obstructive nephropathy by comparing it to existing AKI biomarkers. Methods: A total of 49 patients, 21 controls, and 28 hydronephrosis (HN) cases were assessed. AKI biomarkers in bladder (BL) urine and renal pelvic (RP) urine in the HN group were compared to each BL marker in the control group. In a subgroup of cases receiving interventions for obstructive nephropathy, the BL values of each biomarker were assessed after the intervention. Results: RP vanin-1 levels were significantly higher while BL vanin-1 levels were marginally higher in the HN group than in the control group. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve values for RP and BL vanin-1 were 0.9778 and 0.6386, respectively. In multivariate analyses, BL vanin-1 and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), but not kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) or neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), were independent factors for predicting the presence of HN. In cases receiving interventions, vanin-1 decreased significantly from 1 week after the intervention in cases of moderate to severe obstructive nephropathy compared to RP values at baseline. Conclusion: Urinary vanin-1 is a useful biomarker to detect and monitor the clinical course of obstructive nephropathy.

BackgroundTo assess whether hemorrhagic complications associated with transperineal prostate biopsy increased in patients on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy.MethodsIn total, 598 consecutive patients underwent transperineal prostate biopsy. The medication group comprised patients who took anti-thromboembolic agents, and the control group comprised those who did not take these agents. No anti-thromboembolic agent was stopped before, during, or after prostate biopsy in the medication group. Complications developing in both groups were compared and classified using the modified Clavien classification system. Subgroup analyses to compare complications in patients taking single antiplatelet, single anticoagulant, and dual antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant agents, and multivariate analyses to predict bleeding risk were also performed.ResultsOf the 598 eligible patients, 149 comprised the medication group and 449 comprised the control group. Hematuria (Grade I) developed in 88 (59.1%) and 236 (52.5%) patients in the medication and control group, respectively (p = 0.18). Clot retention (Grade I) was more frequently observed in the medication group than the controls (2.0% versus 0.2%, respectively, p < 0.05). Hospitalization was more frequently prolonged in the medication than the control group (4.0% versus 0.4% of patients, respectively). No complication of Grade III or higher developed in either group. Hematuria was more frequent in patients taking a single anticoagulant (p = 0.007) or two anti-thromboembolic agents (p = 0.04) compared with those taking a single antiplatelet agent. Other complications were generally similar among the groups. In the multivariate analysis, taking more than two anti-thromboembolic agents was the only significant risk factor for bleeding events.ConclusionNo severe complication developed after the transperineal biopsies in either group, although minor bleeding was somewhat more frequent in the medication group. It may not be necessary to discontinue anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet agents when transperineal prostate biopsy is contemplated.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosevolume histogram parameters for late hematuria and rectal hemorrhage in patients receiving radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Patients and Methods: Data of 86 patients treated between January 2006 and June 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. The median radiation dose was 64 Gy in 32 fractions. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify optimal cut-off values for late adverse events. Results: Eleven patients experienced hematuria, and the 5-year cumulative rate was 18%. Four patients experienced rectal hemorrhage, and the 5-year cumulative rate was 7%. ROC curve analysis demonstrated the following significant cutoff values: bladder V50 Gy: 43% (p=0.02) and V40 Gy: 50% (p=0.03) for hematuria, and rectum V60 Gy: 13% (p=0.04) and V50 Gy: 33% (p=0.03) for rectal hemorrhage. Conclusion: This is the first study to identify dose constraints that may reduce hematuria and rectal hemorrhage in patients receiving radiotherapy in the postoperative setting.Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men worldwide (1). Surgery is the mainstay of curative treatment for prostate cancer (2). In recent years, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), which offers minimally invasive treatment, has rapidly gained global popularity (3-5). However, positive surgical margins have been reported in 14-33%, with 5-year prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure rates of 13-37% after surgery (4-8). Postoperative radiotherapy has been reported to improve overall and biochemical progression-free survival in patients with positive surgical margins and seminal vesicle invasion (9, 10). In addition, salvage radiotherapy has been found to improve prostate cancer-specific survival compared with observation in patients with PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy (11). Therefore, radiotherapy plays a major role as adjuvant therapy in prostate cancer.Radiotherapy is generally considered to be less invasive than surgery. The recent development of high precision radiotherapy for prostate cancer has improved dose conformity to the target (12-14). However, preventing adverse events remains a challenge, as the base of the prostate is located in close proximity to the organs at risk, which include the bladder and rectum. Late hematuria and rectal hemorrhage are particularly considered to be refractory and chronic conditions that decrease patient quality of life. Establishing appropriate dose constraints for minimizing these adverse events is therefore of particular necessity. The dose constrains for several organs, including the rectum, bladder, penile bulb, and femoral head have been reported from cases of prostate cancer treated with radical radiotherapy (15-18). However, reports regarding the association between dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters and late hematuria and rectal bleeding in the postoperative setting are scarce (19).Therefore, we evaluated the DVH parameters and clinical factors associated with late hematuria and rectal hemorrhage in patients...

No abstract