In recent time, it has become more and more probable that patients with severe diffuse coronary artery disease, who are not candidates for aortocoronary bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures, can benefit from transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR). But the underlying principle of TMR still remains unclear. This study reports on a histological analysis of eight patients, in whom a total of 250 channels had been created, who died after TMR. The TMR channels were created by a C02 laser surrounded by a zone of necrosis with an extent of about 500 Fm. In the hearts of patients who died in the early postoperative period (1 to 7 days postoperative), almost all channels were closed by fibrin clots, erythrocytes, and macrophages. There were no obvious connections between the channels and the ventricular cavity. In specimens from patients, who died 2 or more weeks after the procedure, a granular tissue with high macrophage and monocyte activity was observable. Within this tissue, we observed a developing network of capillaries. Otherwise, the tissue filling the channels did not substantially differ from scar tissue. We failed to observe connections between the ventricular cavity and the new capillaries. Whether these vessels within the closed channels have any impact on myocardial perfusion remains unclear, but it seems unlikely that the clinical effects of TMR are based on the principle of the amphibian heart. (J Card Surg 1996;11:326-331) There are patients with coronary artery disease, who despite severe angina and significantly restricted quality of life cannot be treated by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or aortocoronary bypass operation. This concerns patients with diffuse sclerosis of the coronary arteries, as well as those with very small coronaries (small vessel disease). Currently, these patients were more and more treated by transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR).During a TMR procedure, the surgeon drills
The transmission of donor-related malignancies by organ transplantation is a rather rare event. There has only been one report on the development of a brain tumor metastasis in liver transplantation. From September 1988 to January 1993, 342 donor hepatectomies with subsequent transplantation were performed at our center. The main donor diagnoses included subarachnoidal bleeding (n = 128; 37.4%), isolated head injury (n = 114; 33.3%), multiple injuries (n = 55; 16.1%), primary cerebral neoplasia (n = 13; 3.8%), and other (n = 32; 9.4%). Primary cerebral neoplasia included glioblastoma (n = 4), meningioma (n = 3), astrocytoma (n = 2), angioma (n = 2), neurocytoma (n = 1), and ependymoma (n = 1). In the group of donors suffering from primary cerebral neoplasia, procured organs other than the liver included kidneys (n = 20), combined kidneys and pancreata (n = 1), pancreata (n = 2), hearts (n = 8), combined hearts and lungs (n = 1), and single lungs (n = 1). Follow-up of the respective graft recipients ranged from 28 to 68 months (median 43 months). Recurrent malignancy was observed once, in a liver graft recipient. The donor, a 48-year-old female, had undergone surgical resection of an intracerebral multiform glioblastoma and died 4 months later of a relapse in the brain stem. The 28-year-old female recipient had undergone transplantation for an autoimmune-hepatitic cirrhosis. Four months later, histopathological examination of an intraperitoneal and intrahepatic mass revealed a poorly differentiated, small-cell pleomorphic cancer, identified as a glioma metastasis by S100- and glial fibrillary acidic protein immunohistochemical staining. The patient died 6 months post-transplantation. On autopsy, no further neoplastic lesions were detected. Our review adds a second reported case of a liver graft-transmitted brain tumor to the literature and the fourth donor-related malignancy after hepatic transplantation in general.
The transmission of donor-related malignancies by organ transplantation is a rather rare event. There has only been one report on the development of a brain tumor metastasis in liver transplantation. From September 1988 to January 1993, 342 donor hepatectomies with subsequent transplantation were performed at our center. The main donor diagnoses included subarachnoidal bleeding (n = 128; 37.4%), isolated head injury (n = 114; 33.3%), multiple injuries (n = 55; 16.1%), primary cerebral neoplasia (n = 13; 3.8%), and other (n = 32; 9.4%). Primary cerebral neoplasia included glioblastoma (n = 4), meningioma (n = 3), astrocytoma (n = 2), angioma (n = 2), neurocytoma (n = 1), and ependymoma (n = 1). In the group of donors suffering from primary cerebral neoplasia, procured organs other than the liver included kidneys (n = 20), combined kidneys and pancreata (n = 1), pancreata (n = 2), hearts (n = 8), combined hearts and lungs (n = 1), and single lungs (n = 1). Follow-up of the respective graft recipients ranged from 28 to 68 months (median 43 months). Recurrent malignancy was observed once, in a liver graft recipient. The donor, a 48-year-old female, had undergone surgical resection of an intracerebral multiform glioblastoma and died 4 months later of a relapse in the brain stem. The 28-year-old female recipient had undergone transplantation for an autoimmune-hepatitic cirrhosis. Four months later, histopathological examination of an intraperitoneal and intrahepatic mass revealed a poorly differentiated, small-cell pleomorphic cancer, identified as a glioma metastasis by S100- and glial fibrillary acidic protein immunohistochemical staining. The patient died 6 months post-transplantation. On autopsy, no further neoplastic lesions were detected. Our review adds a second reported case of a liver graft-transmitted brain tumor to the literature and the fourth donor-related malignancy after hepatic transplantation in general.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.