BackgroundTo overcome obstacles within the Slovenian organised cervical cancer screening programme, a randomised pilot study of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among non-attenders was performed, aiming to assess three different screening approaches.Participants and methodsNon-attenders aged 30–64 years from two Slovenian regions were randomised to two HPV self-sampling groups–the opt-in (I1, n = 14.400) and the opt-out (I2, n = 9.556), with a control group (P, n = 2.600). Self-collected samples were analysed using the Hybrid Capture 2 assay. HPV-positive women were invited to a colposcopy. The overall and type-specific intention-to-screen response rates and histological outcomes with a positive predictive value (PPV) according to the women’s age, the screening approach, the level of protection resulting from previous screening history, and the region of residence were assessed.ResultsOf the 26.556 women enrolled, 8.972 (33.8%) responded with self-sample for HPV testing and/or traditional cytology within one year of enrolment. Response rates were 37.7%, 34.0% and 18.4% (p < 0.050) for opt-out, opt-in and control groups. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2+ was diagnosed in 3.9/1.000, 3.4/1.000, and 3.1/1.000 women (p > 0.050), respectively. PPV of the HPV self-sampling was 12.0% and 9.6% for CIN2+ and CIN3+. The highest PPV was obtained in non-attenders in screening programme for more than 10-years and concordant results of HPV testing with 40.8% for CIN2+ and 38.8% for CIN3+.ConclusionsThe results of our study show that a high response to HPV self-sampling can be achieved also in an opt-in approach, if women are encouraged to choose between self-sampling at home and screening with gynaecologist. In addition, clinically important risk difference for a high-grade cervical lesion exists in the case of a positive result of HPV testing on self-collected samples, depending on the length of the interval since last screening. Stratified management of these women should be strongly considered. Women who were not screened with cytology for at least 10 years should be referred to immediate colposcopy for histology verification instead to delayed re-testing.

Background p16/Ki-67 dual immunocytochemical staining (DS) has been proven as a sensitive and specific test for triage of HPV positive women with good reproducibility and accuracy. However, implementation of the test into an organized screening program (OSP) is not easy. The aims of this study were to compare the performance and agreement of DS results among three Slovenian cytopathological laboratories involved in the national OSP, and to define cases where staining results can be difficult to interpret. Methods Cervical smears were obtained for DS from 129 women referred to colposcopy. Smears were evaluated blindly in three laboratories by a cytotechnologist and a cytopathologist after initial training. Results were positive, suspicious, negative or inadequate. Five characteristics of DS staining were recorded. After primary evaluation, an extensive expert-led additional training was undertaken, including a discussion of difficult cases and a practical exam. Smears were re-evaluated and results compared to primary evaluation. Results After the additional training, the overall percentage of agreement among the three laboratories increased from 77.5 to 89.9% and kappa increased from 0.70 to 0.86. Sensitivity for CIN2+ increased in two laboratories, to 90.5 and 85.7%, without the loss of specificity (75.8%). In one laboratory, the sensitivity slightly decreased from 90.5 to 88.9%, but the specificity increased from 63.6 to 68.2%. Difficult cases had significantly less DS cells, weak intensity of p16 staining, suboptimal cell morphology and background staining compared to positive cases. Conclusion Additional expert-led training and discussion of difficult cases are necessary for accurate interpretation of DS in laboratories involved in OSP. The most difficult cases were those with single stained cells and weak p16 staining. Training protocol for safe implementation of p16/Ki-67 DS in OSP is proposed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13000-019-0821-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biological behaviour of the marginal epithelium, that proliferates and eventually covers laryngeal granulomas, and to reveal the applicability of the recently re-introduced Ljubljana classification when reporting reactive epithelial hyperplastic lesions. A retrospective clinical and histomorphological analysis was performed on 149 laryngeal granuloma biopsies. Epithelial changes were classified according to the Ljubljana classification into normal epithelium; simple, abnormal, or atypical hyperplasia; and carcinoma in situ. Atrophic epithelium, not evaluated separately in the Ljubljana classification, was additionally assessed. Simple hyperplasia was found in 98 cases (65.8 per cent), abnormal hyperplasia in seven (4.7 per cent), atrophic epithelium in 24 (16.1 per cent), and normal squamous epithelium in 20 (13.4 per cent). Atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma in situ were not observed. The results of our study clearly showed that the proliferation of the covering epithelium mostly in the form of simple hyperplasia, is entirely reactive and therefore reversible. No epithelial hyperplastic lesions were found that were previously described to be associated with an increased risk of malignant alteration, namely atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma in situ. However, since an initial growth of an invasive malignant neoplasm might macroscopically imitate the appearance of laryngeal granuloma, a histological examination in all aetiological forms of laryngeal granulomas is required. By clearly discerning the benign nature of epithelial changes in laryngeal granulomas, the recently re-evaluated and further formulated Ljubljana classification may also influence the clinical handling of patients.

Imprint of SLN biopsy can identify a negative axilla with high accuracy (specificity 99.2%). Overall sensitivity is only 36.5%, but macrometastases are detected in 77% which is important for performing ALDN in one session with operation of primary tumour.