No abstract

Introduction Within the UK, Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a rare surgical emergency which has the potential to cause significant morbidity. Within hospitals that do not have an on-site neurosurgical service, assessment of potential CES patients is performed in the Emergency Department (ED) prior to referral to either local orthopaedic or regional neurosurgical services. Delay or inefficiency in this assessment can result in delayed treatment and worsens patient outcomes. Method A retrospective study with patients identified from the orthopaedic trauma meeting lists over a 6-month period. Only patients assessed by the emergency department were included (25 total). Direct referrals and those with infective symptoms were excluded. ED clinical notes were assessed, and the documentation was compared against a standard from the American Spinal Cord Injury Association. Documentation of pre- and post-void bladder scan was also assessed. Results Of the 25 total patients, 60% had a full lower limb neurological examination documented. 20% had no documented neurological examination and 20% had an incomplete neurological examination. Only 68% of patients had a Per Rectal exam performed, of those 94% had perianal sensation assessed. 56% of patients did not have a post-void bladder scan documented. Conclusions Limitations to initial ED assessment of likely CES patients can delay diagnosis and treatment which can have devastating consequences for the patient. The data is limited by reliance on an accurate trauma list and exclusion of patients who were referred directly to neurosurgery from ED. Our recommendations include introduction of a CES assessment proforma within ED and a re-audit cycle.