In a surveillance study of candidemia in cancer patients that was conducted by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 249 episodes were noted; Candida albicans was isolated in 70% (63) of the 90 cases involving patients with solid tumors (tumor patients) and in 36% (58) of the 159 involving those with hematologic disease (hematology patients). Neutropenia in tumor patients and acute leukemia and antifungal prophylaxis in hematology patients were significantly associated with non-albicans candidemia in a multivariate analysis. Overall 30-day mortality was 39% (97 of 249). In a univariate analysis, Candida glabrata was associated with the highest mortality rate (odds ratio, 2.66). Two multivariate analyses showed that mortality was associated with older age and severity of the underlying disease. Among hematology patients, additional factors associated with mortality were allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, septic shock, and lack of antifungal prophylaxis.
This is the first completed prospective randomized clinical efficacy trial of antifungals in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis (IA) and the first to compare the clinical efficacy of two dosages of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) for IA in neutropenic patients with cancer or those undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Eighty-seven of 120 patients were eligible and evaluable. Clinical responses were documented for 26 (64%) of 41 patients receiving 1 mg/(kg.d) (L-AmB-1) and 22 (48%) of 46 receiving 4 mg/(kg.d) (L-AmB-4). Radiologic response rates were similar: 24 (58%) of the L-AmB-1 recipients and 24(52%) of the L-AmB-4 recipients. The six-month survival rates were 43% (L-AmB-1) and 37% (L-AmB-4). These differences were not significant. The numbers of deaths directly due to IA at 6 months were similar: 9 (22%) of 41 L-AmB-1 recipients and 9 (20%) of 46 L-AmB-4 recipients. No other variable independently influenced survival, apart from central nervous system IA. L-AmB is effective in treating approximately 50%-60% of patients who have IA. A 1-mg/(kg.d) dosage is as effective as a 4-mg/(kg.d) dosage, and no advantages to use of the higher, more expensive, dosage has been observed.
Forty-one episodes of breakthrough fungaemia occurring over a 7.5 year period in the National and St Elizabeth's Cancer Institutes in Bratislava, Slovakia, were analysed. Five of them occurred during prophylaxis with fluconazole (one Torulopsis glabrata, one Hansenula anomala, two Candida krusei and one Candida parapsilosis), ten with itraconazole (three Trichosporon pullulans, one Trichosporon beigelii, one Cryptococcus laurentii, three Candida albicans and two T. glabrata), 11 during prophylaxis with ketoconazole (one Candida norvegenesis, one C. parapsilosis, one C. krusei, one Candida tropicalis, five C. albicans, one Candida stellatoidea and one C. laurentii and 15 during empirical therapy with amphotericin B (ten C. albicans, two T. beigelii and three Candida lusitaniae). The most frequent risk factors for breakthrough fungaemia were neutropenia, previous therapy with multiple antibiotics and recent catheter insertion. Comparing these episodes with 38 non-breakthrough fungaemias (appearing at the same institute in the same period) differences in certain risk factors were noted: breakthrough fungaemias were more frequently observed in patients with acute leukaemia (39.0% vs 5.2%, P < 0.001), mucositis (34.2% vs 13.1%, P < 0.05), prophylaxis with quinolones (58.5% vs 15.8%, P < 0.0001) and catheter-associated infections (29.3% vs 2.6%, P < 0.003). In this subgroup overall mortality (36.6% vs 28.8%) or early attributable mortality (22.0% vs 23.6%) were not significantly different.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.